Literature DB >> 11051581

Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.

J E Carr1, A C Nicolson, T S Higbee.   

Abstract

We evaluated a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment within the context of an early intervention program for 3 children who had been diagnosed with autism. Subsequent curriculum-based reinforcer evaluations confirmed the predictions of the preference assessments. In addition, eight additional preference assessments that were conducted over a period of 1 month indicated generally stable preferences for 2 of the 3 participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11051581      PMCID: PMC1284262          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  5 in total

1.  A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; V S Canipe; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

2.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

3.  A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; K Hilker; K M Derby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

4.  Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; L G Bowman; L Toole
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

5.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996
  5 in total
  49 in total

1.  The reductive effects of noncontingent reinforcement fixed-time versus variable-time schedules.

Authors:  J E Carr; K K Kellum; I M Chong
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Using fixed-time schedules to maintain behavior: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  C L Dozier; J E Carr; K Enlof; H Landaburu; D Eastridge; K K Kellum
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

4.  Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  Tami Lavie; Peter Sturmey
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

5.  Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

6.  Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities: a survey of current practices.

Authors:  Richard B Graff; Amanda M Karsten
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2012

7.  An evaluation of the number of presentations of target sounds during stimulus-stimulus pairing trials.

Authors:  Adriane Miliotis; Tina M Sidener; Kenneth F Reeve; Vincent Carbone; David W Sidener; Lisa Rader; Lara Delmolino
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

8.  Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children.

Authors:  Catherine A Cote; Rachel H Thompson; Gregory P Hanley; Paige M McKerchar
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

9.  Evaluating preference assessments for use in the general education population.

Authors:  Jennifer L Resetar; George H Noell
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

10.  Teaching social-communication skills to preschoolers with autism: efficacy of video versus in vivo modeling in the classroom.

Authors:  Kaitlyn P Wilson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.