Literature DB >> 18809132

Vaginal microbicide preferences among midwestern urban adolescent women.

Amanda E Tanner1, Jennifer M Katzenstein, Gregory D Zimet, Dena S Cox, Anthony D Cox, J Dennis Fortenberry.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess adolescent women's preferences for specific microbicide characteristics including pregnancy prevention, timing of application, potential for side effects, and whether it targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other sexually transmitted infections (STI). Potential differences in microbicide preferences by adolescent age group and behavioral patterns including engaging in sexual intercourse and use of hormonal contraception were examined, as it was hypothesized that as adolescents progress into adulthood and gain sexual experience their preferences in microbicide characteristics may shift.
METHOD: Adolescent and young women (N = 405, 56.0% African American; 24.0% Euro-American) between the ages of 14 and 20 (mean = 17.0, SD = 1.8) were recruited from urban community-based clinics. Video-Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews were conducted with the young women, during which they were asked about their preferences regarding the characteristics of hypothetical vaginal microbicides. Conjoint analysis was utilized to determine adolescent women's relative preferences for each microbicide characteristic and intent-to-purchase microbicides based upon a combination of the selected properties.
RESULTS: Overall, the results suggest adolescent and young women had an ordered preference for a microbicide with (1) no side effects, (2) pregnancy prevention, (3) postcoital application, and (4) protection against HIV. Age and behavioral group conjoint analyses resulted in the same pattern of preferences as those reported for the entire group. However, women having sex and not using hormonal contraception had a stronger preference for postcoital application.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that young women's ratings of microbicides were sensitive to characteristics such as side effects, pregnancy prevention, and timing of application and should be considered in microbicide development. The conjoint analysis approach is useful in understanding microbicide preferences, and should be utilized with other populations to assess preferences for specific microbicide characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809132      PMCID: PMC2593640          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  23 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  C J Armitage; M Conner
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

2.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  An assessment of the effect of data collection setting on the prevalence of health risk behaviors among adolescents.

Authors:  Laura Kann; Nancy D Brener; Charles W Warren; Janet L Collins; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Microbicide preference among young women in California.

Authors:  Bethany Young Holt; Vicki G Morwitz; Long Ngo; Polly F Harrison; Kevin J Whaley; Audrey Pettifor; Anh-Hoa Nguyen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Adolescent girls' communication with "mothers" about topical microbicides.

Authors:  Punita K Sunder; Stephanie Ramos; Mary B Short; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.

Authors:  M Ryan; J Hughes
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.

Authors:  G Farr; H Gabelnick; K Sturgen; L Dorflinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Context of Acceptability of Topical Microbicides: Sexual Relationships.

Authors:  Helen P Koo; Cynthia Woodsong; Barbara T Dalberth; Meera Viswanathan; Ashley Simons-Rudolph
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2005-03

10.  Adolescents' descriptions of the physical characteristics of microbicide surrogates and experiences of use.

Authors:  E Alexandra Zubowicz; Jennifer K Oakes; Mary B Short; Michelle M Perfect; Paul S Succop; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.681

View more
  12 in total

1.  Attitudes towards microbicide use for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Marina Catallozzi; Camille Y Williams; Gregory D Zimet; Katharine M Hargreaves; Shari E Gelber; Adam J Ratner; Lawrence R Stanberry; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 2.  The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Reviewing the Literature and Building a New Concept.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-03-08

Review 3.  Moving beyond safe sex to women-controlled safe sex: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Kamila A Alexander; Christopher L Coleman; Janet A Deatrick; Loretta S Jemmott
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Oral and vaginal HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis product attribute preferences among female sex workers in the Mexico-US border region.

Authors:  H A Pines; S A Strathdee; C W Hendrix; C C Bristow; A Harvey-Vera; C Magis-Rodríguez; G Martinez; S J Semple; T L Patterson
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 1.359

5.  What Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Angela Fagerlin; Holly O Witteman; Christine Holmberg; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Young women's contraceptive microbicide preferences: associations with contraceptive behavior and sexual relationship characteristics.

Authors:  Candace Best; Amanda E Tanner; Devon J Hensel; J Dennis Fortenberry; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-12-10

Review 7.  Research on adolescents and microbicides: a review.

Authors:  Amanda E Tanner; Mary B Short; Gregory D Zimet; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Increasing the effectiveness of vaginal microbicides: a biophysical framework to rethink behavioral acceptability.

Authors:  Stéphane Verguet; Bethany Young Holt; Andrew J Szeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Drivers of Vaginal Drug Delivery System Acceptability from Internet-Based Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel J Primrose; Toral Zaveri; Alyssa J Bakke; Gregory R Ziegler; Howard R Moskowitz; John E Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Qualitative exploration of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence acceptability of semisoft vaginal suppositories.

Authors:  Toral Zaveri; Kimberly A Powell; Kate M Guthrie; Alyssa J Bakke; Gregory R Ziegler; John E Hayes
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.