Literature DB >> 24325312

Young women's contraceptive microbicide preferences: associations with contraceptive behavior and sexual relationship characteristics.

Candace Best1, Amanda E Tanner, Devon J Hensel, J Dennis Fortenberry, Gregory D Zimet.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In time, microbicides may provide women with dual prevention against pregnancy and STDs. Although several microbicide dimensions have been evaluated, little is known about women's preferences for contraceptive microbicides and correlates of these preferences.
METHODS: Acceptability of a hypothetical contraceptive microbicide cream or jelly was examined among a -clinic-based sample of 266 women in Indianapolis from 2004 (when participants were aged 14-22) to 2008. Group conjoint analyses and individual conjoint analyses were used to compare preferences with respect to four microbicide -dimensions: contraceptive ability, efficacy in relation to condoms, timing of use and texture. Pearson's product moment correlations were used to examine the relationship between preferences for a contraceptive microbicide and selected characteristics of the women.
RESULTS: Overall, the top-rated microbicide dimensions were efficacy in relation to that of condoms and contraceptive ability (importance scores, 40.0 and 35.4 out of 100.0, respectively). When all dimension levels were compared, contraceptive ability was the most strongly preferred (part-worth utility score, 8.9), and lower efficacy than that of -condoms was the least strongly preferred (-11.9). Preference for contraceptive microbicides was positively -associated with current contraceptive use, sexual agency, partner communication, commitment to avoiding pregnancy and -perceived partner agreement about avoiding pregnancy (coefficients, 0.07-0.18). It was negatively associated with current or past nonuse of contraceptives, seeking pregnancy and perceived partner agreement about seeking -pregnancy (-0.08 to -0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Microbicides with dual prevention properties may be attractive to young women. Microbicide development and subsequent clinical trials should incorporate contraceptive microbicides.
Copyright © 2013 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24325312      PMCID: PMC4183361          DOI: 10.1363/46E0114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  31 in total

1.  The state of hormonal contraception today: overview of unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women.

Authors:  Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Janet A Frohlich; Anneke C Grobler; Cheryl Baxter; Leila E Mansoor; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Koleka P Mlisana; Zaheen Omar; Tanuja N Gengiah; Silvia Maarschalk; Natasha Arulappan; Mukelisiwe Mlotshwa; Lynn Morris; Douglas Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The future of HIV prevention: prospects for an effective anti-HIV microbicide.

Authors:  Jeremy Nuttall; Joseph Romano; Karen Douville; Caroline Galbreath; Annaléne Nel; William Heyward; Mark Mitchnick; Saul Walker; Zeda Rosenberg
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  Vaginal microbicide preferences among midwestern urban adolescent women.

Authors:  Amanda E Tanner; Jennifer M Katzenstein; Gregory D Zimet; Dena S Cox; Anthony D Cox; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  A comparison of young women's actual and assigned timing of use of a microbicide surrogate.

Authors:  Amanda E Tanner; Katherine A Roof; Barry P Katz; Adrian Katschke; J Dennis Fortenberry; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.706

7.  Who's responsible? Correlates of partner involvement in contraceptive decision making.

Authors:  Shanna Cox; Samuel F Posner; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

8.  Daily mood, partner support, sexual interest, and sexual activity among adolescent women.

Authors:  J Dennis Fortenberry; M'Hamed Temkit; Wanzhu Tu; Cynthia A Graham; Barry P Katz; Donald P Orr
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Adolescents' descriptions of the physical characteristics of microbicide surrogates and experiences of use.

Authors:  E Alexandra Zubowicz; Jennifer K Oakes; Mary B Short; Michelle M Perfect; Paul S Succop; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Developing multipurpose reproductive health technologies: an integrated strategy.

Authors:  P F Harrison; A Hemmerling; J Romano; K J Whaley; B Young Holt
Journal:  AIDS Res Treat       Date:  2013-02-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  Oral and vaginal HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis product attribute preferences among female sex workers in the Mexico-US border region.

Authors:  H A Pines; S A Strathdee; C W Hendrix; C C Bristow; A Harvey-Vera; C Magis-Rodríguez; G Martinez; S J Semple; T L Patterson
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 1.359

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.