Literature DB >> 9226144

Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.

M Ryan1, J Hughes.   

Abstract

To date, standard gamble, time trade-off, visual analogue and, more recently, willingness to pay, have been most commonly employed in health economics to assess utilities from various health care interventions. This article considers the use of conjoint analysis as an alternative technique to assess utilities. The technique is applied to assess women's preferences for the management of miscarriage. The paper addresses methodological issues in the application of the technique to health care and demonstrates its use in estimating willingness to pay and utilities. It is concluded that conjoint analysis is potentially a very useful tool and that future research should investigate more thoroughly the potential application of the technique in health economics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9226144     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::aid-hec262>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  50 in total

1.  Public involvement in health care priority setting: an economic perspective.

Authors:  Tracy Roberts; Stirling Bryan; Chris Heginbotham; Alison McCallum
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Culture, self-rated health and resource allocation decision-making.

Authors:  V L Wiseman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1999

3.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

Review 4.  Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare. Matching the art to the science.

Authors:  E McIntosh; C Donaldson; M Ryan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.

Authors:  A Bowling; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 6.  Valuing health-related quality of life. Issues and controversies.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  The citizen's preferences for financing public health care: a Danish survey.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Ulla Slothuus
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2002-03

8.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; F Reed Johnson; Tara Maddala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Discrete choice experiments in health care.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.