Literature DB >> 7998637

Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.

G Farr1, H Gabelnick, K Sturgen, L Dorflinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to determine the contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and to provide data about the device to the US Food and Drug Administration.
METHODS: The clinical trial was conducted at six US sites and three sites in Latin America. Eligible subjects were in mutually monogamous relationships and agreed to use the female condom as their only means of contraception for 6 months.
RESULTS: A total of 328 subjects contributed to the analysis of contraceptive efficacy. Twenty-two US subjects and 17 Latin American subjects became pregnant, yielding 6-month gross cumulative accidental pregnancy rates of 12.4 and 22.2, respectively. During perfect (consistent and correct) use of the method, the 6-month accidental pregnancy rates were 2.6 and 9.5 for the US and Latin American centers, respectively. There were no serious adverse events related to the use of the method.
CONCLUSIONS: The female condom provides contraceptive efficacy in the same range as other barrier methods, particularly when used consistently and correctly, and has the added advantage of helping protect against sexually transmitted diseases.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7998637      PMCID: PMC1615396          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  4 in total

Review 1.  Methodological pitfalls in the analysis of contraceptive failure.

Authors:  J Trussell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Preliminary evaluation of REALITY, a condom for women to wear.

Authors:  M A Leeper; M Conrardy
Journal:  Adv Contracept       Date:  1989-12

Review 3.  A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies.

Authors:  J Trussell; R A Hatcher; W Cates; F H Stewart; K Kost
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods.

Authors:  J Trussell; K Sturgen; J Strickler; R Dominik
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr
  4 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Female-initiated barrier methods for the prevention of STI/HIV: where are we now? Where should we go?

Authors:  M Latka
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and stage of change for female and male condoms among Denver inner-city women.

Authors:  Sheana Salyers Bull; Samuel F Posner; Charlene Ortiz; Thomas Evans
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Vaginal microbicide preferences among midwestern urban adolescent women.

Authors:  Amanda E Tanner; Jennifer M Katzenstein; Gregory D Zimet; Dena S Cox; Anthony D Cox; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  The promises and limitations of female-initiated methods of HIV/STI protection.

Authors:  Joanne E Mantell; Shari L Dworkin; Theresa M Exner; Susie Hoffman; Jenni A Smit; Ida Susser
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  More on women and the prevention of HIV infection.

Authors:  Z A Stein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Effectiveness of an intervention promoting the female condom to patients at sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Authors:  L Artz; M Macaluso; I Brill; J Kelaghan; H Austin; M Fleenor; L Robey; E W Hook
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  The female condom: tool for women's empowerment.

Authors:  E L Gollub
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Failure of many United States Department of Health Web sites to provide accurate information about the female condom.

Authors:  Christina Ventura-DiPersia; Kristina Rodriguez; Elizabeth A Kelvin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  Understanding contraceptive failure.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.237

10.  Preventing HIV infection in women.

Authors:  Adaora A Adimora; Catalina Ramirez; Judith D Auerbach; Sevgi O Aral; Sally Hodder; Gina Wingood; Wafaa El-Sadr; Elizabeth A Bukusi
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.