STUDY OBJECTIVE: Topical microbicides, a female-initiated method to protect against sexually transmitted infections (STI) and pregnancy, will only be effective if found acceptable. Mothers may have an influence on acceptability and use among adolescent girls. The current study examined the communication between girls and mothers to understand the potential predictors and nature of conversations regarding surrogate microbicide products. DESIGN: Sexually experienced girls, 14 to 21 years, were recruited for a 6-month study examining microbicide acceptability. During face-to-face interviews, qualitative data were collected regarding communication between girls and mothers. Two independent raters coded the responses, which were organized into themes. Themes were interpreted according to the conceptual understanding of mother-daughter communication. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the 171 girls with codable responses had a conversation with their mother. Higher levels of indirect parental monitoring were related to being more likely to have a conversation. Concrete events related to the study (i.e. receiving phone call from the researcher, having an appointment, or seeing the product) or inquiries by mothers appeared to promote conversation. Barriers to conversation included the private nature of the information and relationship issues between the mother and daughter. Conversations often addressed issues related to girls' participation in the study, although some conversations included global issues related to sexuality. CONCLUSIONS: Girls may talk to their mothers about new products for STI prevention, and such conversations may provide opportunities to promote use.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Topical microbicides, a female-initiated method to protect against sexually transmitted infections (STI) and pregnancy, will only be effective if found acceptable. Mothers may have an influence on acceptability and use among adolescent girls. The current study examined the communication between girls and mothers to understand the potential predictors and nature of conversations regarding surrogate microbicide products. DESIGN: Sexually experienced girls, 14 to 21 years, were recruited for a 6-month study examining microbicide acceptability. During face-to-face interviews, qualitative data were collected regarding communication between girls and mothers. Two independent raters coded the responses, which were organized into themes. Themes were interpreted according to the conceptual understanding of mother-daughter communication. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the 171 girls with codable responses had a conversation with their mother. Higher levels of indirect parental monitoring were related to being more likely to have a conversation. Concrete events related to the study (i.e. receiving phone call from the researcher, having an appointment, or seeing the product) or inquiries by mothers appeared to promote conversation. Barriers to conversation included the private nature of the information and relationship issues between the mother and daughter. Conversations often addressed issues related to girls' participation in the study, although some conversations included global issues related to sexuality. CONCLUSIONS:Girls may talk to their mothers about new products for STI prevention, and such conversations may provide opportunities to promote use.
Authors: Richard A Crosby; Ralph J DiClemente; Gina M Wingood; Kathy Harrington; Suzy Davies; Edward W Hook; M Kim Oh Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Alia A Rai; Bonita Stanton; Ying Wu; Xiaoming Li; Jennifer Galbraith; Lesley Cottrell; Robert Pack; Carole Harris; Dawn D'Alessandri; James Burns Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: M Katherine Hutchinson; John B Jemmott; Loretta Sweet Jemmott; Paula Braverman; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Amanda E Tanner; Jennifer M Katzenstein; Gregory D Zimet; Dena S Cox; Anthony D Cox; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Susan L Rosenthal; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Lisa S Ipp; Jane Chang; Jenny K R Francis; Mei-Chen Hu Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 1.814