Literature DB >> 18802681

Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique.

M Cecconi1, D Dawson, R M Grounds, A Rhodes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lithium dilution cardiac output by LiDCOplus (LiDCO, Cambridge, UK) is a validated methodology for measuring cardiac output. It is used to calibrate a pulse pressure analysis algorithm (PulseCO) for the continuous measurement of subsequent changes in this variable. The variability of measurements, or precision, within patients of lithium dilution cardiac output has not previously been described.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five hemodynamically stable patients in intensive care, with no significant variability in heart rate, mean arterial pressure or central venous pressure, were recruited. Fifty-three determinations of cardiac output were made, each using four lithium dilution measurement curves performed consecutively within a maximum period of 10 min. The coefficient of variation of the measurements was determined and used to derive the least significant change in cardiac output that this technique could reliably detect.
RESULTS: For a single measurement, the coefficient of variation was 8%. This equates to the technique being able to detect a change (least significant change) between two measurements of 24%. Averaging two lithium dilution measurements improved the coefficient of variation to 6% with a least significant change of 17%. Using the average of three curves reduced the coefficient of variation to 5% with a least significant change of 14%.
CONCLUSIONS: To achieve a good precision with this technique, three lithium dilution measurements should be averaged. This will allow changes in cardiac output of more than 14% to be reliably detected. The understanding of the precision of this technique allows the user to know when a real change has happened to their patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18802681     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1292-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  24 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Thermodilution cardiac output--are three injections enough?

Authors:  L B Nilsson; J C Nilsson; L T Skovgaard; P G Berthelsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are?

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Michael Grounds; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.687

4.  Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J R Jansen; A Versprille
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  The thermodilution method for the clinical assessment of cardiac output.

Authors:  J R Jansen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Ostergaard; L B Nilsson; J C Nilsson; J P Rasmussen; P G Berthelsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique.

Authors:  Maria Gabriella Costa; Giorgio Della Rocca; Paolo Chiarandini; Silvia Mattelig; Livia Pompei; Mauricio Sainz Barriga; Toby Reynolds; Maurizio Cecconi; Paolo Pietropaoli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  Rupert M Pearse; Kashif Ikram; John Barry
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  William T McGee; Jeffrey L Horswell; Joachim Calderon; Gerard Janvier; Tom Van Severen; Greet Van den Berghe; Lori Kozikowski
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Fluid responsiveness predicted by noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test.

Authors:  Brahim Benomar; Alexandre Ouattara; Philippe Estagnasie; Alain Brusset; Pierre Squara
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Mervyn Singer; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Agreement between stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis during fluid loads in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Lars Øivind Høiseth; Ingrid Elise Hoff; Ove Andreas Hagen; Svein Aslak Landsverk; Knut Arvid Kirkebøen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Transient stop-flow arm arterial-venous equilibrium pressure measurement: determination of precision of the technique.

Authors:  Hollmann D Aya; Andrew Rhodes; Nick Fletcher; R Michael Grounds; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jochen Mayer; Joachim Boldt; Andinet M Mengistu; Kerstin D Röhm; Stefan Suttner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Pulse pressure analysis: to make a long story short.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2009: II. Neurology, cardiovascular, experimental, pharmacology and sedation, communication and teaching.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Sophie Marqué; Alain Cariou; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Pierre Squara
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.