Literature DB >> 17468561

Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are?

Maurizio Cecconi, Michael Grounds, Andrew Rhodes.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17468561     DOI： 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328149af80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN： 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique.

Authors:  M Cecconi; D Dawson; R M Grounds; A Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Mervyn Singer; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?

Authors:  Davinder Ramsingh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.