BACKGROUND: Bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements have been a mainstay in clinical monitoring of critically ill patients for more than 30 years. Usually the results of an arbitrarily chosen number (1-6) of thermal indicator injections are averaged to increase the reliability of the measurement. The number of injections needed to achieve a given level of precision has, however, not previously been systematically investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 80 hemodynamically stable patients cardiac output was determined as the average of eight injections of 10 ml of iced saline. From the 638 measurements we examined the relationship between the number of thermal indicator injections and the precision of the resulting cardiac output estimate. Furthermore, the association between the number of injections and the least detectable difference among two sets of measurements was established. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that one needs to average the results of four injections to be 95% confident that the result is within 5% of the 'true' cardiac output and that two series of four measurements have to differ by at least 7% before one can be sure (95%) that a change in cardiac function has taken place.
BACKGROUND: Bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements have been a mainstay in clinical monitoring of critically illpatients for more than 30 years. Usually the results of an arbitrarily chosen number (1-6) of thermal indicator injections are averaged to increase the reliability of the measurement. The number of injections needed to achieve a given level of precision has, however, not previously been systematically investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 80 hemodynamically stable patients cardiac output was determined as the average of eight injections of 10 ml of iced saline. From the 638 measurements we examined the relationship between the number of thermal indicator injections and the precision of the resulting cardiac output estimate. Furthermore, the association between the number of injections and the least detectable difference among two sets of measurements was established. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that one needs to average the results of four injections to be 95% confident that the result is within 5% of the 'true' cardiac output and that two series of four measurements have to differ by at least 7% before one can be sure (95%) that a change in cardiac function has taken place.
Authors: Kapil Gupta; Soren Sondergaard; Geoffrey Parkin; Mark Leaning; Anders Aneman Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ingeborg H F Herold; Salvatore Saporito; R Arthur Bouwman; Patrick Houthuizen; Hans C van Assen; Massimo Mischi; Hendrikus H M Korsten Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Angela Briganti; Flavia Evangelista; Paola Centonze; Annaliso Rizzo; Francesco Bentivegna; Antonio Crovace; Francesco Staffieri Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: William T McGee; Jeffrey L Horswell; Joachim Calderon; Gerard Janvier; Tom Van Severen; Greet Van den Berghe; Lori Kozikowski Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097