Literature DB >> 15504196

Thermodilution cardiac output--are three injections enough?

L B Nilsson1, J C Nilsson, L T Skovgaard, P G Berthelsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements have been a mainstay in clinical monitoring of critically ill patients for more than 30 years. Usually the results of an arbitrarily chosen number (1-6) of thermal indicator injections are averaged to increase the reliability of the measurement. The number of injections needed to achieve a given level of precision has, however, not previously been systematically investigated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 80 hemodynamically stable patients cardiac output was determined as the average of eight injections of 10 ml of iced saline. From the 638 measurements we examined the relationship between the number of thermal indicator injections and the precision of the resulting cardiac output estimate. Furthermore, the association between the number of injections and the least detectable difference among two sets of measurements was established.
CONCLUSION: The current study shows that one needs to average the results of four injections to be 95% confident that the result is within 5% of the 'true' cardiac output and that two series of four measurements have to differ by at least 7% before one can be sure (95%) that a change in cardiac function has taken place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15504196     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00514.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  10 in total

1.  Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique.

Authors:  M Cecconi; D Dawson; R M Grounds; A Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Applying mean systemic filling pressure to assess the response to fluid boluses in cardiac post-surgical patients.

Authors:  Kapil Gupta; Soren Sondergaard; Geoffrey Parkin; Mark Leaning; Anders Aneman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Importance of re-calibration time on pulse contour analysis agreement with thermodilution measurements of cardiac output: a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Christopher G Scully; Shanti Gomatam; Shawn Forrest; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Hasse Møller-Sørensen; Joakim Cordtz; Morten Østergaard; Jens C Nilsson; Kristoffer L Hansen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable.

Authors:  Mik Wetterslev; Hasse Møller-Sørensen; Rasmus Rothmann Johansen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The cardiac output from blood pressure algorithms trial.

Authors:  James X Sun; Andrew T Reisner; Mohammed Saeed; Thomas Heldt; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Precision of the transpulmonary thermodilution measurements.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Romain Persichini; Mariem Ktari; Mathieu Jozwiak; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Reliability, repeatability, and reproducibility of pulmonary transit time assessment by contrast enhanced echocardiography.

Authors:  Ingeborg H F Herold; Salvatore Saporito; R Arthur Bouwman; Patrick Houthuizen; Hans C van Assen; Massimo Mischi; Hendrikus H M Korsten
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  A preliminary study evaluating cardiac output measurement using Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) in anaesthetized dogs.

Authors:  Angela Briganti; Flavia Evangelista; Paola Centonze; Annaliso Rizzo; Francesco Bentivegna; Antonio Crovace; Francesco Staffieri
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  William T McGee; Jeffrey L Horswell; Joachim Calderon; Gerard Janvier; Tom Van Severen; Greet Van den Berghe; Lori Kozikowski
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.