Literature DB >> 18801445

Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: an fMRI investigation of the size-weight illusion.

Philippe A Chouinard1, Mary-Ellen Large, Erik C Chang, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

In size-weight (SW) illusions, people learn to scale their fingertip forces for lifting small and big objects of equal weight even though they fail to learn perceptually that both objects have the same weight. The question then arises as to what the separate neural mechanisms are for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of these objects during lifting. To answer this question, we used fMRI to first identify areas that code for the size, weight, and density of objects using an adaptation paradigm. We then contrasted BOLD in the SW illusion condition in which subjects falsely perceived the smaller of two equally weighted objects as heavier versus a condition in which size and weight did not differ between objects. Sensory areas in the parietal and temporal cortex adapted to the size of objects and the primary motor area (M1) contralateral to the lifting hand adapted to the weight of objects. The ventral premotor area (PMv), which did not adapt to either the size or the weight of objects, adapted instead to the density of objects, and responded more when subjects falsely perceived differences in weight between objects in the SW illusion condition. Taken together, we conclude that the real-world properties of objects, such as size and weight, are computed by sensory areas and by M1 respectively, whereas the perceived heaviness of objects, presumably based on their apparent density, is computed by PMv, a higher-order area well placed to integrate sensory information about the size of objects and the weight of objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801445     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Functional MRI mapping of category-specific sites associated with naming of famous faces, animals and man-made objects.

Authors:  Hong-Min Bai; Tao Jiang; Wei-Min Wang; Tian-Dong Li; Yan Liu; Yi-Cheng Lu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Perception-action dissociation generalizes to the size-inertia illusion.

Authors:  Jonathan Platkiewicz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 6.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Superior size-weight illusion performance in patients with schizophrenia: evidence for deficits in forward models.

Authors:  Lisa E Williams; Vilayanur S Ramachandran; Edward M Hubbard; David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  The integration of size and weight cues for perception and action: evidence for a weight-size illusion.

Authors:  Sarah Hirsiger; Kristen Pickett; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.