Literature DB >> 22968739

The integration of size and weight cues for perception and action: evidence for a weight-size illusion.

Sarah Hirsiger1, Kristen Pickett, Jürgen Konczak.   

Abstract

Humans routinely estimate the size and weight of objects. Yet, when lifting two objects of equal weight but different size, they often perceive the smaller object as being heavier. This size-weight illusion (SWI) is known to have a lesser effect on motor control of object lifting. How the nervous system combines "weight" and "size" cues with prior experience and whether these cues are differentially integrated for perception and sensorimotor action is still not fully understood. Therefore, we assessed not only whether the experience of size biases weight perception, but also if experience of weight biases the size perception of objects. Further, to investigate differences between perceptual and motor systems for cue-experience integration, participants haptically explored the weight of an object with one hand and then shaped the aperture of their other hand to indicate its perceived size. Results-First, next to a SWI, healthy adults (N = 21) perceived lighter objects as being smaller and heavier objects as being larger, demonstrating a weight-size illusion (WSI). Second, participants were more susceptible to either the SWI or WSI. Third, aperture of the non-exploring hand was scaled to perceived weight and not to physical size. Hand openings were consistently smaller than physical size, with SWI-sensitive participants being significantly more affected than WSI-sensitive subjects. We conclude: first, both size and weight perceptions are biased by prior experience. Weight perception is biased by expectations of size, while size perception is influenced by the expectancy of weight. Second, humans have the tendency to use one cue predominantly for both types of perception. Third, combining perceived weight with expected size influenced hand motor control, while online haptic feedback was largely ignored. Finally, we present a processing model underlying the size-weight cue integration for the perceptual and motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22968739     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3247-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  D J Murray; R R Ellis; C A Bandomir; H E Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

2.  Heaviness perception. IV. Weight x aperture -1 as a heaviness model in finger-grasp perception.

Authors:  Satoru Kawai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: the influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight.

Authors:  Anton J M Dijker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-27

Review 5.  Perceptual learning: inverting the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: an fMRI investigation of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Mary-Ellen Large; Erik C Chang; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  When is a weight not illusory?

Authors:  H E Ross
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  R R Ellis; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

10.  Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys.

Authors:  M Mishkin; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  How Weight Affects the Perceived Spacing between the Thumb and Fingers during Grasping.

Authors:  Annie A Butler; Martin E Héroux; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A mass-density model can account for the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Knut Drewing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Size, weight, and expectations.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Kim Vos; Emma Abbink; Myrthe Plaisier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.695

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.