Literature DB >> 18795343

Technical factors related to the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation after transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine.

Zhiming Chen1, Jie Zhao, Hao Xu, Aigang Liu, Jiandong Yuan, Cong Wang.   

Abstract

Segmental pedicle screw fixation is rapidly becoming a popular method of spinal instrumentation. Few studies have investigated the rates of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation. The purpose of our study were to investigate the incidence of superior segment facet joint violation after pedicle screw instrumentation in the lumbar spine and to evaluate technical factors related to the incidence. A prospective study including 96 patients who underwent lumbar and lumbosacral fusion was conducted between March 2006 and December 2007. All patients had bilateral or unilateral posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation with either CD-Horizon (top-loading screw) or TSRH (side-connecting screw) implants. Pedicle screws were instrumented according to the methods advocated by Roy-Camille (Group 1, 20 cases) or Weinstein (Group 2, 76 cases). All patients had computed tomography scan at 1 week post operation. CT scans were reviewed blind by an experienced spine research fellow and a consultant radiologist to determine violation of the adjacent superior segment facet joint. Superior segment facet joint violation occurred in all of the 20 patients (100%) and all of the top-level screws (100%) in Group 1. The spinal research fellow noted the incidence of facet joint violation to be present in 23.8% of the screws and 32.9% of the patients in Group 2, whereas the consultant radiologist noted this to be the case in 25.2 and 35.5%, respectively. The incidence of facet joint violation in patients with CD-Horizon screws was far lower than patients with TSRH screws (P < 0.001). In conclusion, it seems that meticulous surgical dissection without injuring the top-level facet joints, proper instrumentation of pedicle screws with the appropriate entry site (Weinstein's method), trajectory, and use of top-loading screw heads are some ways that surgeons could minimize the risk of top-level facet joint violation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18795343      PMCID: PMC2583192          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0776-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Complications associated with pedicle screws.

Authors:  J E Lonstein; F Denis; J H Perra; M R Pinto; M D Smith; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up].

Authors:  P Guigui; P Wodecki; P Bizot; P Lambert; G Chaumeil; A Deburge
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-10

3.  Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Biomechanics of thoracolumbar spinal fixation. A review.

Authors:  M H Krag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement.

Authors:  J N Weinstein; K F Spratt; D Spengler; C Brick; S Reid
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Plating of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar injuries with pedicle screw plates.

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; G Saillant; C Mazel
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Load-bearing characteristics of lumbar facets in normal and surgically altered spinal segments.

Authors:  M Lorenz; A Patwardhan; R Vanderby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; E Abe; Y Shimada; K Okuyama; T Suzuki; K Sato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  John Glaser; Mark Stanley; Hutha Sayre; Joyce Woody; Ernest Found; Kevin Spratt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating.

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; G Saillant; C Mazel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  19 in total

1.  CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws.

Authors:  Todd M Chapman; Daniel J Blizzard; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Yong Ahn; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenbin Ding; Yile Chen; Hui Liu; Jianru Wang; Zhaomin Zheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Percutaneous pedicle screw placements: accuracy and rates of cranial facet joint violation using conventional fluoroscopy compared with intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography computer navigation.

Authors:  Tetsuro Ohba; Shigeto Ebata; Koji Fujita; Hironao Sato; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation plus kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar fractures A2, A3 and B2.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Eva Mpountogianni; Vasilleios Syrimpeis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A novel blasted and grooved low profile pedicle screw able to resist high compression bending loads.

Authors:  Sung-Uk Kuh; Young-Sung Kim; Hong-June Choi; Kyung-Hyun Kim; Jeong-Yoon Park; Hyun-Yong Jeong; Dong-Kyu Chin; Keun-Su Kim; Young-Sul Yoon; Yoon-Chul Lee; Yong-Eun Cho
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-06-30

7.  [Research progress of spontaneous facet fusion after lumbar spine surgery].

Authors:  Xingxiao Pu; Long Zhao; Xiandi Wang; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-04-15

8.  Multimodal Applications of 3D-Navigation in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Impacts on Precision, Accuracy, Complications, and Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Pritem A Rajamani; Sandeep Tapashetti; Tushar Sathish Kunder
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

9.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  A new lumbar fixation device alternative to pedicle-based stabilization for lumbar spine: In vitro cadaver investigation.

Authors:  Cengiz Gomleksiz; Deniz Ufuk Erbulut; Halil Can; Manoj Kumar Kodigudla; Amey V Kelkar; Eser Kasapoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.