Literature DB >> 11060428

[Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up].

P Guigui1, P Wodecki, P Bizot, P Lambert, G Chaumeil, A Deburge.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Little is known about the impact of posterolateral arthrodesis on adjacent levels. In order to examine this question, we analyzed the radiological evolution of the lumbar spine in patients treated for lumbar stenosis, comparing cases where posterolateral arthrodesis was used with the other cases. Our aim was to determine whether the long-term radiographical modifications were affected by the arthrodesis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among our series of patients presenting with lumbar stenosis between 1984 and 1992, we retained two groups: patients in group 1 (n=46) who underwent single-level decompressions at L4-L5 or L4-L5 and L5-S1 level; and patients in group II (n=81) who underwent decompressions on the same levels associated with posterolateral arthrodesis extending from L4 to the sacrum with or without instrumentation. We compared the course of the two levels above the decompression (L2-L3 and L3-L4) between the two groups. We compared three radiological parameters: disc height, intervertebral slipping, and intersegmental mobility. We also examined the correlations between radiological modifications and functional outcome. Mean follow-up for these 127 patients was 9 years.
RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for age, gender, follow-up, and presurgical functional score, disc height and intervertebral slipping at equivalent levels. At last follow-up, disc narrowing was observed at L2-L3 and L3-L4; it was significantly greater in the group with complementary arthrodesis. At L3-L4, intervertebral slipping also worsened more in the arthrodesis patients. Use of osteosynthesis significantly increased the risk of developing such radiological lesions. These lesions were associated, solely in the arthrodesis group, with poorer functional outcome.
CONCLUSION: Our findings allow the conclusion that, despite the effect of physiological aging, the observed long-term degenerative lesions in patients undergoing treatment of lumbar stenosis are related to the associated arthrodesis which increases their frequency and severity, deteriorating the functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11060428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  14 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis in childhood, adolescent and young adult by the "double-plate" technique: a past experience.

Authors:  Raphaël Vialle; Sebastian Charosky; Jean-Paul Padovani; Pierre Rigault; Christophe Glorion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Jacques Sénégas; Jean-Marc Vital; Vincent Pointillart; Paolo Mangione
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Technical factors related to the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation after transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Zhiming Chen; Jie Zhao; Hao Xu; Aigang Liu; Jiandong Yuan; Cong Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Single-Level PLIF: Comparison between Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Chang Hun Yu; Jung Eun Lee; Jae Jun Yang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-05-02

5.  Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jigar Anandjiwala; Jun-Yeong Seo; Kee-Yong Ha; In-Soo Oh; Dong-Cheul Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  How does lumbar degenerative disc disease affect the disc deformation at the cephalic levels in vivo?

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Qun Xia; Peter Passias; Weishi Li; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Soo-Eon Lee; Sung-Bae Park; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Chun-Kee Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-05-20

9.  NFlex Dynamic Stabilization System : Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Coe; Scott H Kitchel; Hans Jörg Meisel; Charles H Wingo; Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-06-30

10.  Disc height and anteroposterior translation in fused and adjacent segments after lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer; Oliver Haas; Martin Huber-Stentrup; Christian Georg; Wolfgang Frobin
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.