Literature DB >> 22843132

Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Ranjith Babu1, Jong G Park, Ankit I Mehta, Tony Shan, Peter M Grossi, Christopher R Brown, William J Richardson, Robert E Isaacs, Carlos A Bagley, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Oren N Gottfried.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superior-level facet joint violation by pedicle screws may result in increased stress to the level above the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease. Previous studies have evaluated facet joint violations in open or percutaneous screw cases, but there are no reports describing a direct institutional comparison.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of superior-level facet violation for open vs percutaneous pedicle screws and to evaluate patient and surgical factors that affect this outcome.
METHODS: We reviewed 279 consecutive patients who underwent an index instrumented lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2011 for degenerative spine disease with stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. We used a computed tomography grading system that represents progressively increasing grades of facet joint violation. Patient and surgical factors were evaluated to determine their impact on facet violation.
RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 126 open and 153 percutaneous cases. Percutaneous procedures had a higher overall violation grade (P = .02) and a greater incidence of high-grade violations (P = .006) compared with open procedures. Bivariate analysis showed significantly greater violations in percutaneous cases for age < 65 years, obesity, pedicle screws at L4, and 1- and 2-level surgeries. Multivariate analysis showed the percutaneous approach and depth of the spine to be independent risk factors for high-grade violations.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates greater facet violations for percutaneously placed pedicle screws compared with open screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843132      PMCID: PMC3477296          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  44 in total

1.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T Laine; T Lund; M Ylikoski; J Lohikoski; D Schlenzka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Martin Wood; Richard Mannion
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-02

3.  Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Kouji Sato; Toshihiro Ando; Hidefumi Inoh; Hiroshi Nakamura
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-10

Review 4.  Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Praveenan Sivabalan; Jane Li
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Hung-Tae Chung; Jae-Lim Cho; Dong-Jun Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  A review of lumbar spinal instrumentation: evidence and controversy.

Authors:  Maya A Babu; Jean-Valery C Coumans; Bob S Carter; William R Taylor; Ekkehard M Kasper; Ben Z Roitberg; William E Krauss; Clark C Chen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Authors:  L P Amiot; K Lang; M Putzier; H Zippel; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Superior segment facet joint violation and cortical violation after minimally invasive pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Knox; Joseph M Dai; Joseph R Orchowski
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Yung Park; Joong Won Ha; Yun Tae Lee; Na Young Sung
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  35 in total

1.  CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws.

Authors:  Todd M Chapman; Daniel J Blizzard; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Xiaoqi He; Tianwei Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reduction in complication and revision rates for robotic-guided short-segment lumbar fusion surgery: results of a prospective, multi-center study.

Authors:  Jason I Liounakos; Vignessh Kumar; Aria Jamshidi; Zmira Silman; Christopher R Good; Samuel R Schroerlucke; Andrew Cannestra; Victor Hsu; Jae Lim; Faissal Zahrawi; Pedro M Ramirez; Thomas M Sweeney; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Degeneration with the VariLift-L Interbody Fusion System: Retrospective Review of 470 Cases.

Authors:  Warren F Neely; Frank Fichtel; Diana Cardenas Del Monaco; Jon E Block
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-03

5.  Percutaneous pedicle screw placements: accuracy and rates of cranial facet joint violation using conventional fluoroscopy compared with intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography computer navigation.

Authors:  Tetsuro Ohba; Shigeto Ebata; Koji Fujita; Hironao Sato; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shutao Gao; Zhengtao Lv; Huang Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system.

Authors:  Ioannis D Siasios; John Pollina; Asham Khan; Vassilios George Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

8.  One and two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using an expandable, stand-alone, interbody fusion device: a VariLift® case series.

Authors:  Rebecca Barrett-Tuck; Diana Del Monaco; Jon E Block
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03

9.  [A comparative study of spinal robot-assisted and traditional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous reduction and internal fixation for single-level thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptoms].

Authors:  Ye Tian; Jianan Zhang; Hao Chen; Keyuan Ding; Tuanjiang Liu; Dageng Huang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-15

10.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.