Literature DB >> 18775734

Memory mechanisms in grasping.

Constanze Hesse1, Volker H Franz.   

Abstract

The availability of visual information influences the execution of goal-directed movements. This is very prominent in memory conditions, where a delay is introduced between stimulus presentation and execution of the movement. The corresponding effects could be due to a decay of the visual information or to different processing mechanisms used for movements directed at visible (dorsal stream) and remembered (ventral stream) objects as proposed by the two visual systems hypothesis. In three experiments, the authors investigated grasping under full vision and three different delay conditions with increasing memory demands. Results indicate that the visuomotor information used for grasping decays rapidly. No evidence was found for qualitative changes in movement kinematics and the use of different representations for visually guided and memory guided movements. Findings rather suggest that delayed grasping is similar to grasping directed to larger objects under full vision. Therefore, the authors propose that grasping after a delay is guided by classic memory mechanisms and that this is reflected in an increasing maximum grip aperture in grasping.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18775734     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  21 in total

1.  Effect of visual and tactile feedback on kinematic synergies in the grasping hand.

Authors:  Vrajeshri Patel; Martin Burns; Ramana Vinjamuri
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.

Authors:  M A Spiegel; D Koester; T Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-06

4.  Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-01-20

5.  Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bimanual movement control is moderated by fixation strategies.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Tristan T Nakagawa; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Infants and adults reaching in the dark.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of removing visual information on reach control in young children.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Development of visual and somatosensory attention of the reach-to-eat movement in human infants aged 6 to 12 months.

Authors:  Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jenni M Karl; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.