Literature DB >> 23239197

Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.

Steven L Prime1, Jonathan J Marotta.   

Abstract

Vision plays a crucial role in guiding motor actions. But sometimes we cannot use vision and must rely on our memory to guide action-e.g. remembering where we placed our eyeglasses on the bedside table when reaching for them with the lights off. Recent studies show subjects look towards the index finger grasp position during visually-guided precision grasping. But, where do people look during memory-guided grasping? Here, we explored the gaze behaviour of subjects as they grasped a centrally placed symmetrical block under open- and closed-loop conditions. In Experiment 1, subjects performed grasps in either a visually-guided task or memory-guided task. The results show that during visually-guided grasping, gaze was first directed towards the index finger's grasp point on the block, suggesting gaze targets future grasp points during the planning of the grasp. Gaze during memory-guided grasping was aimed closer to the blocks' centre of mass from block presentation to the completion of the grasp. In Experiment 2, subjects performed an 'immediate grasping' task in which vision of the block was removed immediately at the onset of the reach. Similar to the visually-guided results from Experiment 1, gaze was primarily directed towards the index finger location. These results support the 2-stream theory of vision in that motor planning with visual feedback at the onset of the movement is driven primarily by real-time visuomotor computations of the dorsal stream, whereas grasping remembered objects without visual feedback is driven primarily by the perceptual memory representations mediated by the ventral stream.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239197     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3358-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades.

Authors:  D Melcher; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

4.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuomotor memory for target location in near and far reaching spaces.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  The specificity of learned associations in visuomotor and perceptual processing.

Authors:  L Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gaze behavior when reaching to remembered targets.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Yasuo Terao; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback.

Authors:  Prajith Sivakumar; Derek J Quinlan; Kevin M Stubbs; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Methods to explore the influence of top-down visual processes on motor behavior.

Authors:  Jillian Nguyen; Thomas V Papathomas; Jay H Ravaliya; Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Eye-hand coordination: memory-guided grasping during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Hana H Abbas; Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Rapid assessment of hand reaching using virtual reality and application in cerebellar stroke.

Authors:  E L Isenstein; T Waz; A LoPrete; Y Hernandez; E J Knight; A Busza; D Tadin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  The influence of object shape and center of mass on grasp and gaze.

Authors:  Loni Desanghere; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16

8.  Fixation Biases towards the Index Finger in Almost-Natural Grasping.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automatically Characterizing Sensory-Motor Patterns Underlying Reach-to-Grasp Movements on a Physical Depth Inversion Illusion.

Authors:  Jillian Nguyen; Ushma V Majmudar; Jay H Ravaliya; Thomas V Papathomas; Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Vision facilitates tactile perception when grasping an object.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Francisco L Colino; Xhino Meleqi; Gordon Binsted; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.