Literature DB >> 20217402

Bimanual movement control is moderated by fixation strategies.

Constanze Hesse1, Tristan T Nakagawa, Heiner Deubel.   

Abstract

Our study examined the effects of performing a pointing movement with the left hand on the kinematics of a simultaneous grasping movement executed with the right hand. We were especially interested in the question of whether both movements can be controlled independently or whether interference effects occur. Since previous studies suggested that eye movements may play a crucial role in bimanual movement control, the effects of different fixation strategies were also studied. Human participants were either free to move their eyes (Experiment 1) or they had to fixate (Experiment 2) while doing the task. The results show that bimanual movement control differed fundamentally depending on the fixation condition: if free viewing was allowed, participants tended to perform the task sequentially, as reflected in grasping kinematics by a delayed grip opening and a poor adaptation of the grip to the object properties for the duration of the pointing movement. This behavior was accompanied by a serial fixation of the targets for the pointing and grasping movements. In contrast, when central fixation was required, both movements were performed fast and with no obvious interference effects. The results support the notion that bimanual movement control is moderated by fixation strategies. By default, participants seem to prefer a sequential behavior in which the eyes monitor what the hands are doing. However, when forced to fixate, they do surprisingly well in performing both movements in parallel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20217402     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2189-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  Gaze anchoring to a pointing target is present during the entire pointing movement and is driven by a non-visual signal.

Authors:  S F Neggers; H Bekkering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Manual asymmetries in the preparation and control of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  P E Mieschke; D Elliott; W F Helsen; R G Carson; J A Coull
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  The coordination of bimanual aiming movements: evidence for progressive desynchronization.

Authors:  B Fowler; T Duck; M Mosher; B Mathieson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

6.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; C Dohle; S Posse; K M Stephan; H Hefter; R J Seitz; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  On the coordination of two-handed movements.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The bilateral reach to grasp movement.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control.

Authors:  L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.