Literature DB >> 28108792

Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control.

Gal Namdar1, Tzvi Ganel2.   

Abstract

Recent literature has established a directional influence of irrelevant numerical magnitude on actions performed toward neutral objects. For example, fingers' aperture during grasping is larger when associated with large compared with small numerical digits. This interaction between symbolic magnitude and visuomotor control has been attributed to the planning stage of the action prior to motor execution. However, this assumption has not been directly tested. In two experiments, we tested whether the effects of numerical magnitude on grasping derive from action planning or from action execution. Participants were asked to grasp an object following a short visual (Experiment 1) or auditory (Experiment 2) presentation of small (1/2) or large (8/9) digits. Grasping was performed under either closed-loop (CL) or open-loop (OL) visuomotor control, for which online vision was prevented during action execution. Digit magnitude affected grip apertures in the CL condition, when online vision was allowed. However, magnitude had no effects on grip aperture in the OL condition. This pattern of results strongly suggests that the processing of numerical magnitude originates from interactions between numerical magnitude and real object size during online motor execution. Unlike previously assumed, the findings also suggest that the effect of magnitude on visuomotor control is not likely to be attributed to the motor planning stage prior to action initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108792     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0837-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  43 in total

1.  The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action.

Authors:  S Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-06

2.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping.

Authors:  Michael Andres; David J Ostry; Florence Nicol; Tomas Paus
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Influence of automatic word reading on motor control.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; M Gangitano
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Finger-number interaction: an ideomotor account.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

5.  Influence of numerical magnitudes on the free choice of an object position.

Authors:  Claudia Gianelli; Mariagrazia Ranzini; Michele Marzocchi; Leticìa Rettore Micheli; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

6.  Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  D A Westwood; T McEachern; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Binding space and time through action.

Authors:  N Binetti; N Hagura; C Fadipe; A Tomassini; V Walsh; S Bestmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; David A Westwood; Kenneth F Valyear; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Grasping numbers.

Authors:  Giovanna Moretto; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.

Authors:  V H Franz; C Hesse; S Kollath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel; Gal Namdar; Avigail Mirsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Compatibility between object size and response side in grasping: the left hand prefers smaller objects, the right hand prefers larger objects.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Peter Wühr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.