Literature DB >> 22198531

Infants and adults reaching in the dark.

Erin Babinsky1, Oliver Braddick, Janette Atkinson.   

Abstract

It has been shown that infants over the age of 6 months will reach for an object in complete darkness. This experiment measured the reaching movements of 9- to 16-month-old infants and adults under several different conditions of illumination to investigate the role of vision and stored visual representations in reach control. In one condition, participants reached for an object with the lights on. In a second condition, participants reached for an object glowing in the dark (glowing condition). This allowed us to measure the effects of vision of the arm and vision of the reach space. We also looked at the effect of removing vision of the object on reach control: in the final two conditions, participants reached for an object in complete darkness (0-s dark) and in complete darkness after a 4-s delay (4-s dark). We compared the kinematics of a reach (e.g. average speed, reach straightness) between the four illumination conditions. The results showed that infants reached faster and decelerated for a shorter period of time in the dark (0- and 4-s dark) than in the light. By comparison, adults reached slower and decelerated for a longer period of time in the dark (0- and 4-s dark) than in the light. We did not find any effect of the glowing condition compared to full vision on infant reaching movements. These results suggest that infant reaching movements only become compromised when the target is not visible, whereas vision of the hand and the reach space are less significant. Without online visual feedback, an infant reach in the dark appears to be driven by feedforward mechanisms and control may be affected by an immature ability to form and/or retain visual spatial memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198531     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2984-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension.

Authors:  J D Connolly; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension.

Authors:  A Churchill; B Hopkins; L Rönnqvist; S Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

5.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

6.  Development of sensitivity to pictorial depth.

Authors:  A Yonas; W T Cleaves; L Pettersen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Reaching in the dark.

Authors:  J G Wishart; T G Bower; J Dunkeld
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Visual control of reaching and grasping in infants.

Authors:  M E McCarty; D H Ashmead
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-05

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: the effect of temporal-delay.

Authors:  Mark F Bradshaw; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The development of vision between nature and nurture: clinical implications from visual neuroscience.

Authors:  Giulia Purpura; Francesca Tinelli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Visual-motor coordination in natural reaching of young children and adults.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Chen Yu
Journal:  Cogsci       Date:  2015-07

3.  The effect of removing visual information on reach control in young children.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Early infant's use of visual feedback in voluntary reaching for a spatial target.

Authors:  Lívia S Pogetti; Rosana M de Souza; Eloísa Tudella; Luis A Teixeira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-09

5.  The development of visually guided stepping.

Authors:  Rachel Mowbray; Janna M Gottwald; Manfei Zhao; Anthony P Atkinson; Dorothy Cowie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of visual feedback persistence on visuo-motor skill improvement.

Authors:  Alyssa Unell; Zachary M Eisenstat; Ainsley Braun; Abhinav Gandhi; Sharon Gilad-Gutnick; Shlomit Ben-Ami; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Neural activity in the medial parietal area V6A while grasping with or without visual feedback.

Authors:  Rossella Breveglieri; Annalisa Bosco; Claudio Galletti; Lauretta Passarelli; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Pupillometric VoE paradigm reveals that 18- but not 10-month-olds spontaneously represent occluded objects (but not empty sets).

Authors:  Wiebke Pätzold; Ulf Liszkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use.

Authors:  Roni O Maimon-Mor; Hunter R Schone; David Henderson Slater; A Aldo Faisal; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.