Literature DB >> 23832553

Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.

M A Spiegel1, D Koester, T Schack.   

Abstract

In this study, we have investigated the influence of available attentional resources on the dual-task costs of implementing a new action plan and the influence of movement planning on the transfer of information into visuospatial working memory. To approach these two questions, we have used a motor-memory dual-task design in which participants grasped a sphere and planned a placing movement toward a left or right target according to a directional arrow. Subsequently, they encoded a centrally presented memory stimulus (4 × 4 symbol matrix). While maintaining the information in working memory, a visual stay/change cue (presented on the left, center or right) either confirmed or reversed the planned movement direction. That is, participants had to execute either the prepared or the re-planned movement and finally reported the symbols at leisure. The results show that both, shifts of spatial attention required to process the incongruent stay/change cues and movement re-planning, constitute processing bottlenecks as they both reduced visuospatial working memory performance. Importantly, the spatial attention shifts and movement re-planning appeared to be independent of each other. Further, we found that the initial preparation of the placing movement influenced the report pattern of the central working memory stimulus. Preparing a leftward movement resulted in better memory performance for the left stimulus side, while the preparation of a rightward movement resulted in better memory performance for the right stimulus side. Hence, movement planning influenced the transfer of information into the capacity-limited working memory store. Therefore, our results suggest complex interactions in that the processes involved in movement planning, spatial attention and visuospatial working memory are functionally correlated but not linked in a mandatory fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23832553     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0499-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  82 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

3.  Updating the premotor theory: the allocation of attention is not always accompanied by saccade preparation.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

5.  ERP correlates of linear hand movements: distance dependent changes.

Authors:  Waldemar Kirsch; Erwin Hennighausen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Does attention affect visual feature integration?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D E Presti; M I Posner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Finger-tapping interference as produced by concurrent verbal and nonverbal tasks: an analysis of individual differences in left-handers.

Authors:  K Bathurst; D W Kee
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  The costs of changing an intended action: movement planning, but not execution, interferes with verbal working memory.

Authors:  M A Spiegel; D Koester; M Weigelt; T Schack
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of task difficulty on motor performance and frontal-striatal connectivity in cocaine users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lench; William DeVries; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Pointing movements both impair and improve visuospatial working memory depending on serial position.

Authors:  Clelia Rossi-Arnaud; Emiddia Longobardi; Pietro Spataro
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

3.  Mind Your Grip: Even Usual Dexterous Manipulation Requires High Level Cognition.

Authors:  Erwan Guillery; André Mouraux; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Rumeysa Gunduz Can; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-29

5.  On-item fixations during serial encoding do not affect spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stefan Czoschke; Sebastian Henschke; Elke B Lange
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.