Literature DB >> 18716418

Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients.

Panagiotis Samaras1, Stefan Dold, Julia Braun, Peter Kestenholz, Stefan Breitenstein, Alexander Imhof, Christoph Renner, Frank Stenner-Liewen, Bernhard C Pestalozzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed longevity and complications of totally implantable venous access devices in oncology patients.
METHODS: 197 patients received a total of 201 port devices via the subclavian vein for delivery of chemotherapy between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006. We reviewed the patient charts for port-related complications and risk factors until July 31, 2007.
RESULTS: A total of 47,781 catheter days were analyzed (median, 175 days; range, 1-831). Forty-six different complications occurred (0.96 complications/1,000 catheter days). The only risk factor significantly associated with a higher complication rate was younger age. Older patients had a lower risk for developing complications with a risk reduction of 2.4% for each year. There were no differences regarding underlying tumor, gender, access side, method of placement (subclavian/cephalic vein) or implanting team (thoracic versus visceral surgery). A trend was seen for shorter port longevity in hematologic patients compared to oncologic patients (p = 0.059). The former developed significantly more port-associated infections than solid tumor patients [11/53 cases (21%) versus 2/148 cases (1.4%); p < 0.0001].
CONCLUSIONS: Port-associated infections were mostly observed in younger patients with hematologic neoplasms. Prospective trials should be performed to evaluate the benefit of a prophylactic antimicrobial lock in these selected patients. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716418     DOI: 10.1159/000151393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  18 in total

1.  Safety of central venous catheter placement at diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children.

Authors:  G Gonzalez; A M Davidoff; S C Howard; C-H Pui; B N Rao; J L Shenep; A Wozniak; S J Shochat
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber; Robert Pfitzmann; Herbert A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Catheter-related Complications of Subcutaneous Implantable Venous Access Devices in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Balat; Iryna Schmeil; Thomas Karn; Uwe Holtrich; Loreta Mavrova-Risteska; Achim Rody; Aly Youssef; Lars C Hanker
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Low serum citrulline concentration correlates with catheter-related bloodstream infections in children with intestinal failure.

Authors:  Melissa A Hull; Brian A Jones; David Zurakowski; Bram Raphael; Clifford Lo; Tom Jaksic; Christopher Duggan
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Late complications associated with totally implantable venous access port implantation via the internal jugular vein.

Authors:  Shigeaki Tsuruta; Yasutomo Goto; Hideo Miyake; Hidemasa Nagai; Yuichiro Yoshioka; Norihiro Yuasa; Junichi Takamizawa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.

Authors:  Marcus Schenck; Tim Schneider; Herbert Rübben; Andreas Eisenhardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  The duration of functioning of a subcutaneous implantable port for the treatment of hematological tumors: a single institution-based study.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ohno; Chisaki Mizumoto; Yoshihiro Otsuki; Shigeru Oguma; Yataro Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.

Authors:  Se Jin Ahn; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Jin Wook Chung; Sang Bu An; Yong Hu Yin; Hwan Jun Jae; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.