Literature DB >> 21207035

Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Ulf K M Teichgräber1, Stephan Kausche, Sebastian N Nagel, Bernhard Gebauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective study the success and complication rates after radiologically guided port catheter implantation were evaluated.
METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, 3,160 port catheter systems were implanted in our interventional suite. All interventions were imaging guided. The puncture of the preferably right internal jugular vein (IJV) was ultrasound-assisted and the catheter tip position was controlled with fluoroscopy. Catheter indwelling time and rates of periprocedural, early and late complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: 922,599 catheter days (mean, 292 days; range, 0-2,704 days) were documented. The implantation was successful in 3,153 (99.8%) cases. A total of 374 (11.8%; 0.41/1,000 catheter days) adverse events were recorded. Of these, 42 (1.33%) were periprocedural complications. 86 (3.3%; 0.09/1,000 catheter days) early and 246 (9.4%; 0.27/1,000 catheter days) late onset complications occurred after port implantation. The most common complications were blood stream infection (n = 134; 5.1%; 0.15/1,000 catheter days), catheter-induced venous thrombosis (n = 97; 3.7%; 0.11/1,000 catheter days) and catheter migration (n = 34; 1.3%; 0.04/1,000 catheter days). A total of 193 (6.1%) port explantations were required.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guided port implantation via the IJV results in low periprocedural complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21207035     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2045-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  58 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.

Authors:  R D Lyon; K A Griggs; A M Johnson; J R Olsen
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  [Long-term central venous lines and their complications].

Authors:  U K M Teichgräber; B Gebauer; T Benter; J Wagner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-07

3.  Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.

Authors:  R Biffi; F de Braud; F Orsi; S Pozzi; S Mauri; A Goldhirsch; F Nolè; B Andreoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Christel Fontaine; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Johan De Mey; Gerrit Ponnet; Chris Oost; Jan Lamote; Jacques De Greve; Benjamin Van Camp; Patrick Lacor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access.

Authors:  S O Trerotola; J Kuhn-Fulton; M S Johnson; H Shah; W T Ambrosius; P H Kneebone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].

Authors:  C Albo López; D López Rodríguez; M I Constenla Camba; A Jimenéz Blanco; L F Araujo; J García-Medina
Journal:  Sangre (Barc)       Date:  1999-06

7.  Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients.

Authors:  U Mey; A Glasmacher; C Hahn; M Gorschlüter; C Ziske; M Mergelsberg; T Sauerbruch; I G H Schmidt-Wolf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; E Patchen Dellinger; Julie L Gerberding; Stephen O Heard; Dennis G Maki; Henry Masur; Rita D McCormick; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne Randolph; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-08-09

9.  Comparison of infections in Hickman and implanted port catheters in adult solid tumor patients.

Authors:  D Pegues; P Axelrod; C McClarren; B L Eisenberg; J P Hoffman; F D Ottery; R D Keidan; M Boraas; J Weese
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  37 in total

1.  [Superior vena cava occlusion : Radiological placement of a central venous port system via femoral vein access].

Authors:  P Heiss; C Stroszczynski; H Gössmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Femoral placement of totally implantable venous power ports as an alternative implantation site for patients with central vein occlusions.

Authors:  Jan P Goltz; Hendrik Janssen; Bernhard Petritsch; Ralph Kickuth
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Letter to the Editor re: "Outcome analysis in 3160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems": observations about right internal jugular access.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Alexis Lacout; Andrea Figl; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Reconciling quality and cost: A case study in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Sascha Domröse; Andreas Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic complications of interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Mark L Lessne; Brian Holly; Steven Y Huang; Charles Y Kim
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Micropuncture Access Set Use During Implantation of Totally Implantable Venous Access Device May Reduce Upper Extremity DVT Incidence Among Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chul Seung Lee; Sung-Hoon Yoon; Seung-Min Lee; In Kyu Lee; Jang Young Kim; Hyun Min Cho; Min Ki Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Percutaneous image-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm or the chest? A patients' point of view.

Authors:  Jan Peter Goltz; Bernhard Petritsch; Johannes Kirchner; Dietbert Hahn; Ralph Kickuth
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  An entirely echo-guided technique for totally implantable access port positioning.

Authors:  Gian Domenico Arzu; Federico Coccolini; Michele Rossi; Fabio Longaretti; Andrea Costanzi; Stefano Senatore; Angelo Miranda; Dario Maggioni
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  A comparison of outcomes and complications of totally implantable access port through the internal jugular vein versus the subclavian vein.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nagasawa; Tomoharu Shimizu; Hiromichi Sonoda; Eiji Mekata; Masato Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Ohta; Satoshi Murata; Tsuyoshi Mori; Shigeyuki Naka; Tohru Tani
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.