Literature DB >> 29275317

Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Martin Jonczyk1,2, Bernhard Gebauer3, Roman Rotzinger3, Dirk Schnapauff3, Bernd Hamm3, Federico Collettini3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable central venous port systems provide a safe and effective, long-term means of access for administration of hyperosmolar, local irritant medication, such as chemotherapy, antibiotics and parenteral nutrition. AIM: To evaluate the combination of access site and level of experience on fluoroscopy times (FT) and dose area products (DAP) during implantation of port catheters in a large patient population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,870 patients (992 women, 878 men; age: 61±13.14 years) were reviewed investigating two groups of junior (≤50 implantations) and senior (>50) radiologists.
RESULTS: Senior radiologists required less FT/DAP (0.24 s/57.3 μGy m2 versus 0.43 s/68.2 μGy m2, respectively; p<0.001). Right jugular vein access required the least FT/DAP (0.25 s/56.15 μGy m2) and right-sided implantation lower FT/DAP (right: 0.26 s/56.4 μGy m2, left: 0.40 s/85.10 μGy m2, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Due to DAP/FT reductions, the right jugular vein seems to be the most favorable implantation side for port systems. For further dose reduction, residents should be well-trained. Copyright
© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Totally implantable central venous port systems; dose area product; fluoroscopy time; radiation exposure; training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29275317      PMCID: PMC5892650          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  41 in total

Review 1.  [Long-term central venous lines and their complications].

Authors:  U K M Teichgräber; B Gebauer; T Benter; J Wagner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-07

2.  Totally implantable venous power ports of the forearm and the chest: initial clinical experience with port devices approved for high-pressure injections.

Authors:  J P Goltz; C Noack; B Petritsch; J Kirchner; D Hahn; R Kickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Increased fluoroscopy time for central venous catheter placement by radiology residents versus staff radiologists.

Authors:  Baogang J Xu; Richard Duszak; Robert S McGinnis; John G Stanfill; Jeff O'Rear; Angel Q An
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Subclavian vein catheterizations: a prospective study. I. Non-infectious complications.

Authors:  R W Bernard; W M Stahl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of complications between transjugular and axillosubclavian approach for placement of tunneled, central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Lee; Seong Tai Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Christel Fontaine; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Johan De Mey; Gerrit Ponnet; Chris Oost; Jan Lamote; Jacques De Greve; Benjamin Van Camp; Patrick Lacor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists.

Authors:  P C Shetty; M K Mody; D J Kastan; R P Sharma; M W Burke; C Venugopal; T H Burke
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access.

Authors:  S L Morris; P F Jaques; M A Mauro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Totally implantable venous access port systems and associated complications: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 2,996 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  L I Ma; Yueping Liu; Jianxin Wang; Yuan Chang; Long Yu; Cuizhi Geng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Application of intracavitary ECG for positioning the totally implantable venous access port in the upper arm of cancer patients.

Authors:  Lihua Shi; Huihui Chen; Yaping Yang; Huifen Li; Jianfang Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Catheter allotopia with totally implantable access port: A report of three cases and literature review.

Authors:  Jialin Gu; Guoli Wei; Lingchang Li; Yi Ji; Jialin Yu; Canhong Hu; Jiege Huo
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-06

3.  Percutaneous implantation of peripherally inserted totally implantable venous access systems in the forearm in adolescent patients.

Authors:  Anne Marie Augustin; Olivia Kertels; Verena Wiegering; Annette Thurner; Ralph Kickuth
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 4.  Analysis of patient's X-ray exposure in hepatic chemosaturation procedures: a single center experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Ebel; Martin Reinhardt; Anne Bettina Beeskow; Felix Teske; Manuel Florian Struck; Rhea Veelken; Florian van Boemmel; Thomas Berg; Michael Moche; Matthias Gutberlet; Holger Gößmann; Timm Denecke
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.795

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.