Literature DB >> 30150457

Catheter-related Complications of Subcutaneous Implantable Venous Access Devices in Breast Cancer Patients.

Ahmed El-Balat1, Iryna Schmeil2, Thomas Karn2, Uwe Holtrich2, Loreta Mavrova-Risteska2, Achim Rody3, Aly Youssef4, Lars C Hanker3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Totally implanted venous access devices (TIVAD) are increasingly used in the treatment of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of early and late complications resulting from subcutaneous TIVADs in patients with breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2009, we reviewed patients with breast cancer who had a TIVAD placed. Early and late complications, as well as risk factors for TIVAD-associated thrombosis were retrospectively assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were included. Complications occurred in 26% of patients, the majority of which were late complications (21.4%.) The development of TIVAD associated thrombosis was the most frequent late complication (16.4%). In the univariate analysis followed by a multivariate model, risk factors for TIVAD associated thrombosis were not identified. Only within the subgroup of metastatic breast cancer patients an increased risk of TIVAD-associated thrombosis of left compared to right venous access was detected (p=0.015).
CONCLUSION: TIVAD implantation done in a gynecological outpatient setting is feasible and safe. Copyright
© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TIVAD; breast cancer; complication; thrombosis; venous access system

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30150457      PMCID: PMC6199593          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  24 in total

1.  Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mariantina Fragou; Andreas Gravvanis; Vasilios Dimitriou; Apostolos Papalois; Gregorios Kouraklis; Andreas Karabinis; Theodosios Saranteas; John Poularas; John Papanikolaou; Periklis Davlouros; Nicos Labropoulos; Dimitrios Karakitsos
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices.

Authors:  P Knebel; L Fischer; J Huesing; R Hennes; M W Büchler; C M Seiler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  S Vescia; A K Baumgärtner; V R Jacobs; M Kiechle-Bahat; A Rody; S Loibl; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 4.  Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Classical external indwelling central venous catheter versus totally implanted venous access systems for chemotherapy administration: a randomized trial in 100 patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  P Carde; M F Cosset-Delaigue; A Laplanche; I Chareau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-06

6.  A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf Karl-Martin Teichgräber; Florian Streitparth; Florian Steitparth; Chie Hee Cho; Thomas Benter; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients.

Authors:  Panagiotis Samaras; Stefan Dold; Julia Braun; Peter Kestenholz; Stefan Breitenstein; Alexander Imhof; Christoph Renner; Frank Stenner-Liewen; Bernhard C Pestalozzi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  A Ignatov; O Hoffman; B Smith; J Fahlke; B Peters; J Bischoff; S-D Costa
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Right or left? Side selection for a totally implantable vascular access device: a randomised observational study.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Lin; Chih-Peng Lin; Chih-Hung Hsu; Ying-Hui Lee; Yi-Ting Lin; Meng-Chi Hsu; Yu-Yun Shao
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution.

Authors:  Elisa Granziera; Marco Scarpa; Angelo Ciccarese; Bogdan Filip; Matteo Cagol; Valentina Manfredi; Rita Alfieri; Connie Celentano; Sandra Cappellato; Carlo Castoro; Muzio Meroni
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Keisuke Obuchi; Ken Imaizumi; Hiroyuki Kasajima; Michihiro Kurushima; Minoru Umehara; Yousuke Tsuruga; Daisuke Yamana; Kentaro Sato; Aya Sato; Shinsaku Suzuki; Kazuaki Nakanishi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian port catheter implantation in resectable breast cancer patients: A novel, safe, and convenient clinical practice.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Yubo Liu; Ping Yu; Na Li; Yan Wang; Xiaoming Xie; Jun Tang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.