Literature DB >> 21442071

Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Ulf K Teichgräber1, Robert Pfitzmann, Herbert A F Hofmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Port systems are easy to implant on an in- or outpatient basis and provide reliable, long-lasting central venous access. They are used mainly for cancer patients.
METHODS: This article is based on a selective literature review, the guidelines of the German Society for Nutrition Medicine and of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, and the recommendations of the German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology.
RESULTS: In modern oncology, central venous port systems are increasingly replacing short-term and permanently tunneled central venous catheters. They are indicated for patients who need long-term intravenous treatment involving, e.g., the repeated administration of chemotherapeutic drugs, parenteral nutrition, transfusions, infusions, injections, and/or blood sample collection. Port systems can markedly alleviate the burden of intravenous therapy and thereby improve these patients' quality of life. The planning, preparation, and performance of port system implantation require meticulous attention to detail. The rate of implantation-associated complications is less than 2% in experienced hands; overall complication rates have been reported from 4.3% to as high as 46%. The proper postoperative use and care of the port system are of decisive importance to the outcome. Reported infection rates during port system use range from 0.8% to 7.5% in current clinical studies.
CONCLUSION: The treatment, follow-up care, and rehabilitation of cancer patients are interdisciplinary tasks. Optimal treatment and complication avoidance require a collaborative effort of all of the involved specialists-not just the physician implanting the port system, but also the oncologists, nutritionists, visiting nurses, and other home health care providers. Continuing medical education, too, plays a role in improving outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442071      PMCID: PMC3063378          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  110 in total

1.  [Repositioning of a central venous catheter with a guide wire with movable core].

Authors:  T Schmitz-Rode; M Kilbinger; R W Günther
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1999-02

Review 2.  [Long-term central venous lines and their complications].

Authors:  U K M Teichgräber; B Gebauer; T Benter; J Wagner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-07

3.  Complications of 1303 central venous cannulations.

Authors:  A Yilmazlar; H Bilgin; G Korfali; A Eren; U Ozkan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Local infusion of urokinase for the lysis of thrombosis associated with permanent central venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  G Fraschini; J Jadeja; M Lawson; F A Holmes; H C Carrasco; S Wallace
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Ethanol flush for the prevention of catheter occlusion.

Authors:  D A Johnston; K Walker; J Richards; C R Pennington
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  The effects of heparin flush on patency of the Groshong catheter: a pilot study.

Authors:  D J Mayo; M K Horne; B L Summers; D C Pearson; C B Helsabeck
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R E Schwarz; J S Groeger; D G Coit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients.

Authors:  U Mey; A Glasmacher; C Hahn; M Gorschlüter; C Ziske; M Mergelsberg; T Sauerbruch; I G H Schmidt-Wolf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Reasons for explantation of totally implantable access ports: a multivariate analysis of 385 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Phillip Knebel; Steffen Schröder; Thomas Bruckner; Markus K Diener; Roland Hennes; Klaus Buhl; Bruno Schmied; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  Suggested consensus.

Authors:  Robert Eckert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Ports made from synthetic materials are poorly visible on x-ray films.

Authors:  Carsten Rusner; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Huber cannula releases silicone particles from port.

Authors:  M Kamal Koudaimi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Patient information is lacking.

Authors:  Joachim Wittenstein
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  In Reply.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Cost and Morbidity Analysis of Chest Port Insertion: Interventional Radiology Suite Versus Operating Room.

Authors:  Jennifer R LaRoy; Sarah B White; Thejus Jayakrishnan; Stephanie Dybul; Dirk Ungerer; Kiran Turaga; Parag J Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  [Arterial malpositioning of a port catheter].

Authors:  H Dralle; K Kols; A Agha; M Sohn; I Gockel; M Lainka
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  [Indications, technique and complications of port implantation].

Authors:  L Haeder; J Jähne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Computed tomography as a problem solving tool in non-radiopaque central venous port systems - A report of three cases.

Authors:  Johannes Gossner
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2014-03-14

10.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.