Literature DB >> 20195680

The duration of functioning of a subcutaneous implantable port for the treatment of hematological tumors: a single institution-based study.

Hitoshi Ohno1, Chisaki Mizumoto, Yoshihiro Otsuki, Shigeru Oguma, Yataro Yoshida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although subcutaneous implantable ports have been indicated as venous access for chemotherapy, these devices have not been used routinely for hematological tumors.
METHODS: Between May 2006 and April 2009, 39 ports were implanted in 37 patients with hematological tumors and 16 ports were implanted in 14 patients with nonhematological tumors. The patients were treated with standard/first-line and/or salvage/second-line or greater chemotherapy, and were prospectively followed until port removal, death, or the end of the study.
RESULTS: Thirty-five (96%) patients with hematological tumors developed grade 4 hematological toxicity, while 1 (7%) patient with nonhematological tumors showed grade 4 neutropenia. The actual duration of the port in situ ranged from 14 to 719 days (mean, 271.4 days) in the hematology group, and from 50 to 955 days (mean, 419.5 days) in the nonhematology group (P = 0.039). The Kaplan-Meier-estimated median duration of port in situ in the hematology group was 364 days, which was significantly shorter than that in the nonhematology group (P = 0.009). When patient death and port removal for the end of treatment were censored, the rate of port functioning at 1 year was estimated to be 83% in the hematology group. Bloodstream infection (BSI) occurred in 7 patients with hematological tumors and in 1 patient with metastatic colorectal cancer; however, microbiological confirmation that the implantable port was the source of the BSI was inconclusive.
CONCLUSION: The duration of port functioning in patients with hematological tumors was comparable to that in patients with nonhematological tumors. The higher rate of BSI in the hematology group was primarily attributable to profound neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195680     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-010-0039-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  21 in total

Review 1.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies.

Authors:  Dennis G Maki; Daniel M Kluger; Christopher J Crnich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Issam Raad; Hend Hanna; Dennis Maki
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  [Central venous catheter-related thrombosis with infection in cancer patients--2 cases].

Authors:  Osamu Imataki; Yotaro Tamai; Mari Watanabe; Yoshiaki Abe; Kimihiro Kawakami
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2006-09

4.  Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R E Schwarz; J S Groeger; D G Coit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.

Authors:  J S Groeger; A B Lucas; H T Thaler; H Friedlander-Klar; A E Brown; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagayama; Akinari Nomura; Atsushi Itami; Hiroshi Okabe; Seiji Sato; Go Watanabe; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Clinical trials for malignant lymphoma in Japan.

Authors:  Kensei Tobinai; Tomomitsu Hotta
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Patients' perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Per Engervall; Hjördis Björvell; Robert Hast; Magnus Björkholm
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients.

Authors:  Panagiotis Samaras; Stefan Dold; Julia Braun; Peter Kestenholz; Stefan Breitenstein; Alexander Imhof; Christoph Renner; Frank Stenner-Liewen; Bernhard C Pestalozzi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  Prospective monocentric study of non-tunnelled central venous catheter-related complications in hematological patients.

Authors:  Anna Maria Nosari; Guido Nador; Andrea De Gasperi; Giuseppe Ortisi; Alberto Volonterio; Silvia Cantoni; Michele Nichelatti; Laura Marbello; Ernestina Mazza; Valentina Mancini; Erica Ravelli; Francesca Ricci; Denis Ciapanna; Federica Garrone; Giovanni Gesu; Enrica Morra
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2008-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  A team-based multidisciplinary approach to managing peripherally inserted central catheter complications in high-risk haematological patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Natalia Curto-García; Julio García-Suárez; Marta Callejas Chavarria; Juan José Gil Fernández; Yolanda Martín Guerrero; Elena Magro Mazo; Shelly Marcellini Antonio; Luis Miguel Juárez; Isabel Gutierrez; Juan José Arranz; Irene Montalvo; Carmen Elvira; Pilar Domínguez; María Teresa Díaz; Carmen Burgaleta
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.603

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.