Literature DB >> 18709351

[Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP)].

U Nagele1, D Schilling, A G Anastasiadis, U Walcher, K D Sievert, A S Merseburger, M Kuczyk, A Stenzl.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithopaxy (MIP) was developed to combine the excellent stone-free rates of the conventional percutaneous nephrolithopaxy (PCNL) technique with the low morbidity of the miniaturized PCNL (Mini-Perc) and, at the same time, achieve a high level of patient comfort. The procedure is characterized not only by the diameter of the miniaturized 18-Fr Amplatz sheath that was adopted from the Mini-Perc but also by the following features: ultrasound-guided puncture of the kidney; single-step dilatation of the access tract; ballistic lithotripsy; a low-pressure irrigation system together with stone retraction by irrigation with a specially designed nephroscope sheath, for the so-called vacuum cleaner effect; and a sealed and tubeless access tract with primary closure of the channel independent of hemorrhage and without a second-look procedure.The results of the first 57 patients demonstrate primary stone-free rates of 92.9% with operating times averaging 62 (25-123) min. Severe complications, such as sepsis or bleeding requiring blood transfusion, did not occur. The high and predictable stone-free rate and a low morbidity comparable to that of ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy make MIP an attractive option for patients and urologists. The "vacuum cleaner effect" with quick removal of stone fragments reduces operating time and prevents new stone formation by avoiding residual fragments. The direct and primary closure of the access tract increases patient comfort and is justified by the reintervention rate of less than 8% in the presented cohort.The lack of a need for second-look nephroscopies, the vacuum cleaner effect, improved patient comfort without nephrostomy tubes, as well as surgery times comparable to that of traditional PCNL demonstrate a consequent evolution of the Mini-Perc. MIP therefore represents a promising and future-oriented module in modern stone therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709351     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1814-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  19 in total

1.  Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  J W Collins; F X Keeley; A Timoney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; David Schilling; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Stefan Corvin; Jörg Seibold; Markus Kuczyk; Arnulf Stenzl; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones.

Authors:  S Lahme; K H Bichler; W L Strohmaier; T Götz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  [Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?].

Authors:  S Lahme; V Zimmermanns; A Hochmuth; V Janitzki
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: one stage or two?

Authors:  J E Wickham; R A Miller; M J Kellett; S R Payne
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1984-12

7.  Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso; M Ficazzola
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in-vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Marcus Horstmann; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Markus A Kuczyk; Ute Walcher; Jörg Hennenlotter; Arnulf Stenzl; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  [Use of a gelatine-thrombin matrix for closure of the access tract without a nephrostomy tube in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy].

Authors:  D Schilling; B Winter; A S Merseburger; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; A Stenzl; U Nagele
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

View more
  13 in total

1.  The hydrodynamic basis of the vacuum cleaner effect in continuous-flow PCNL instruments: an empiric approach and mathematical model.

Authors:  R Mager; C Balzereit; K Gust; T Hüsch; T Herrmann; U Nagele; A Haferkamp; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery using a laparoendoscopic training box: the sandwich model.

Authors:  Stephan Jutzi; Florian Imkamp; Markus A Kuczyk; Ute Walcher; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Predictors of clinical outcome after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculus.

Authors:  Zhao-Lun Li; Qian Deng; Tie Chong; Peng Zhang; He-Cheng Li; Hong-Liang Li; Hai-Wen Chen; Wei-Min Gan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Vacuum cleaner effect, purging effect, active and passive wash out: a new terminology in hydrodynamic stone retrival is arising--Does it affect our endourologic routine?

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Andre Nicklas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Nomenclature in PCNL or The Tower Of Babel: a proposal for a uniform terminology.

Authors:  David Schilling; Tanja Hüsch; Markus Bader; Thomas R Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.

Authors:  André P Nicklas; David Schilling; Markus J Bader; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Minituriazed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what does it mean?

Authors:  W Kamal; P Kallidonis; I Kyriazis; E Liatsikos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Miniaturisation of PCNL.

Authors:  Sven Lahme
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  T Bergmann; T R W Herrmann; Th Schiller; U Zimmermann; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.