Literature DB >> 23979149

New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery using a laparoendoscopic training box: the sandwich model.

Stephan Jutzi1, Florian Imkamp, Markus A Kuczyk, Ute Walcher, Udo Nagele, Thomas R W Herrmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Percutaneous renal surgery (PRS) is a challenging procedure for urologic surgeons and requires a large variety of different skills. Our objective was to improve the preexisting porcine kidney-training model for percutaneous renal access and PRS.
METHODS: For our biologic training model, we use porcine kidneys with preserved ureter. The ureter was dissected, stones were placed into the collecting system using a 16, 5F Amplatz sheath, and a 12Ch indwelling catheter was placed in the ureter for further irrigation with blue-dyed saline. The kidney was placed between two porcine full-thickness skin lobes in an existing laparoscopy trainer (SITUS Box). The kidney was punctured with ultrasound guidance, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) was then performed as previously described. The model was evaluated in MIP training courses, which are regularly held at the Hannover Medical School.
RESULTS: All trainees were urologists with experience in endourologic surgery. Eleven participants were trained in this model. Percutaneous puncture under ultrasonographic guidance and following intrarenal surgery was successful in all 11 (100 %) cases. Therefore, all participants rated the model useful for simulating percutaneous renal surgery.
CONCLUSION: Compared to recently published models, this new porcine kidney model is easy to prepare and is cost-effective by using standard material. Moreover, it provides realistic and reproducible practice for PRS in the laboratory. Unfavorably, the described organ model requires an existing laparoscopy training system. Comprehensively, the presented organ model approximates the natural retroperitoneal circumstances precisely by using the two full-thickness skin flaps with the fatty subcutaneous tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23979149     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1151-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  19 in total

1.  Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000.

Authors:  A Hesse; E Brändle; D Wilbert; K-U Köhrmann; P Alken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Darrell Allen; Tim O'Brien; Richard Tiptaft; Jonathan Glass
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  Walter Ludwig Strohmaier; Andreas Giese
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-26

4.  A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I.

Authors:  Bodo E Knudsen; Edward D Matsumoto; Ben H Chew; Brooke Johnson; Vitaly Margulis; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle; Stephen E Pautler; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Novel biologic model for percutaneous renal surgery learning and training in the laboratory.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Tong-wen Ou; Jian-guo Jia; Wei Gao; Xin Cui; Jiang-tao Wu; Gang Wang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  [Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?].

Authors:  S Lahme; V Zimmermanns; A Hochmuth; V Janitzki
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Felix Wezel; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Modified biological training model for percutaneous renal surgery with ultrasound and fluroscopy guidance.

Authors:  Zhi Qiu; Yong Yang; Yi Zhang; Yu-cheng Sun
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  [Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP)].

Authors:  U Nagele; D Schilling; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; K D Sievert; A S Merseburger; M Kuczyk; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

View more
  2 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Novel Skills Training Model for PCNL, an ESUT project.

Authors:  Giorgio Bozzini; Matteo Maltagliati; Lorenzo Berti; Riccardo Vismara; Francesco Sanguedolce; Alfonso Crisci; Gianfranco Beniamino Fiore; Alberto Redaelli; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Ali Gozen; Alberto Breda; Cesare Scoffone; Kamran Ahmed; Alexander Mueller; Stefano Gidaro; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  Use of a vegetable model as a training tool for PCNL puncture.

Authors:  Maneesh Sinha; Venkatesh Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.