Literature DB >> 27084193

Minituriazed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what does it mean?

W Kamal1, P Kallidonis2, I Kyriazis1, E Liatsikos1.   

Abstract

A lot of interest has been recently attracted to miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Smaller diameter tracts and instruments, in comparison to standard PCNL are utilized to decrease the morbidity of PCNL. However, a debate is ongoing regarding the safety and efficacy of these methods. The growing enthusiasm toward miniaturized PCNL led to different techniques and instruments, and eventually generated confusion in the terminology of PCNL. In this review, we highlight the different modalities of miniaturized PCNL, their indication, their safety and efficacy, and the appropriate terminology is suggested. A comprehensive review of current literature was performed using PubMed(®). Publications relevant to the subject were retrieved and critically appraised. Miniaturized PCNL was introduced with the desire to reduce access-related complications and bleeding. Miniaturized PCNL has yet to prove clear advantage over the standard PCNL. Nevertheless, the current experience proves the safety of the miniaturized techniques. Advantages of the miniaturized PCNL suggested in the literature are the lower bleeding rate and decreased hospital stay. In addition, the miniaturized PCNL has been proven a safe and effective modality of renal stone treatment in pediatric population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Micro PCNL; Mini PCNL; Miniaturized PCNL; Minimally invasive PCNL; Ultra mini PCNL

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27084193     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0881-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  44 in total

1.  Standard, mini, ultra-mini, and micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is next? A novel labeling system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the size of the access sheath used during procedure.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Miniperc? No, thank you!

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Alessandro Piccinelli; Gianluigi Taverna; Alessio Benetti; Luisa Pasini; Matteo Corinti; Alessandro Teppa; Silvia Zandegiacomo de Zorzi; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Felix Wezel; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Zeng; Wei Zhu; Jiasheng Li; Zhijian Zhao; Tao Zeng; Chenli Liu; Yang Liu; Jian Yuan; Shaw P Wan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  M Monga; S Oglevie
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.

Authors:  Fan Cheng; Weimin Yu; Xiaobin Zhang; Sixing Yang; Yue Xia; Yuan Ruan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  O Traxer; T G Smith; M S Pearle; T S Corwin; H Saboorian; J A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone.

Authors:  Shashikant Mishra; Rajan Sharma; Chandrapraksh Garg; Abraham Kurien; Ravindra Sabnis; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  J W Segura; D E Patterson; A J LeRoy; H J Williams; D M Barrett; R C Benson; G R May; C E Bender
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparison of children versus adults undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-scale analysis of a single institution.

Authors:  Guohua Zeng; Zhijian Zhao; ShawPong Wan; Wen Zhong; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Arman Tsaturyan; Marco Lattarulo; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-06-05

2.  Experience of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the creation of nephrostomy tract by plasma vaporization.

Authors:  Yin-Lun Chang; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The use of ureteral access sheath during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with high-power holmium YAG laser.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Marco Lattarulo; Constantinos Adamou; Konstantinos Pagonis; Angelis Peteinaris; Despoina Liourdi; Theofanis Vrettos; Evangelos Liatsikos; Panagiotis Kallidonis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Non papillary mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: early experience.

Authors:  P Kallidonis; A Vagionis; T Vrettos; K Adamou; K Pagonis; P Ntasiotis; G A Callas; L Tanaseskou; A M Al Aown; E Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Recent advances in understanding and managing urolithiasis.

Authors:  Walter L Strohmaier
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.