Literature DB >> 17941796

A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in-vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study.

Udo Nagele1, Marcus Horstmann, Karl-Dietrich Sievert, Markus A Kuczyk, Ute Walcher, Jörg Hennenlotter, Arnulf Stenzl, Aristotelis G Anastasiadis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In recent years, mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (mini-PCNL) has gained popularity because of its reduced invasiveness. To improve clinical outcomes further, research is ongoing in selected centers. Important areas of interest include extravasation into the retroperitoneal space, acute absorption syndrome, and septicemia. The aim of this experimental study was to test a new 18F nephroscope sheath specially designed to decrease intrapelvic pressure during mini-PCNL whatever the irrigation pressure. In addition, the hydrodynamic effects of this device can be used for suction and removal of the stone fragments, in contrast to a standard Amplatz sheath.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a fresh, perfused cadaveric porcine kidney model, the new sheath was compared with a conventional sheath (control) with closed and open Luer-Lok outflow under increasing irrigation pressure. Intrarenal pressure peaks were measured with a urodynamic workstation. The irrigation fluid was marked with an ink that stains only endoluminal surfaces, and a post-measurement histopathologic work-up was performed to evaluate the changes on a morphologic level.
RESULTS: Closing of the control sheath resulted in an increase in the intrapelvic pressure to a maximum of 136 cm H2O. Using the new sheath with a constant output flow made possible by its open proximal end, the maximal intrapelvic pressure remained low at 20 cm H2O, even when the inflow pressure reached 125 cm H2O. The ink distribution on the hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides reflected the results of the pressure measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Newly designed nephroscope sheaths with an open proximal end, such as the one described here, decrease the intrapelvic pressure compared with a closed outflow system. As a result, strict fluid control during the intervention is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17941796     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  22 in total

1.  The hydrodynamic basis of the vacuum cleaner effect in continuous-flow PCNL instruments: an empiric approach and mathematical model.

Authors:  R Mager; C Balzereit; K Gust; T Hüsch; T Herrmann; U Nagele; A Haferkamp; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Technical innovations in endourological stone therapy].

Authors:  P Honeck; U Nagele; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Flow matters 2: How to improve irrigation flow in small-calibre percutaneous procedures-the purging effect.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Ute Walcher; Markus Bader; Thomas Herrmann; Stephan Kruck; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Nomenclature in PCNL or The Tower Of Babel: a proposal for a uniform terminology.

Authors:  David Schilling; Tanja Hüsch; Markus Bader; Thomas R Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.

Authors:  André P Nicklas; David Schilling; Markus J Bader; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Andreas Skolarikos; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Muzaffer Akcay; Cevper Ersoz; Senad Kalkan; Abdullah Armagan; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  [Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP)].

Authors:  U Nagele; D Schilling; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; K D Sievert; A S Merseburger; M Kuczyk; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.