Literature DB >> 15142156

Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

J W Collins1, F X Keeley, A Timoney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs of flexible ureterorenoscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 100 cases using a new flexible ureteroscope (DUR8, Circon ACMI, Stamford, USA), including the indications for flexible ureterorenoscopy, use of laser probes, disposable instrumentation, and the cost and timing of ureteroscope repair.
RESULTS: Of the 100 procedures 68 were for stone disease, 21 for known or suspected transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), six were diagnostic only and five were for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. The ureteroscope was repaired after the 29th and 88th cases. The ability of the ureteroscope to deflect was maintained throughout. At the time of purchase the ureteroscope was listed at pound 15 000 and each repair/exchange currently costs pound 4200, thus the total expenditure on the ureteroscope was pound 23 400. Total expenditure on ancillary equipment was pound 28 727, of which pound 22 927 was on disposables and pound 5800 on 10 laser probes.
CONCLUSION: In this series the costs of the ancillary equipment exceeded the purchase and maintenance of the ureteroscope, and we expect this trend to continue in the long term. The advent of more durable ureteroscopes may ultimately reduce the frequency of costly repairs. The cost of disposables should be considered in planning the budget.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15142156     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04774.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Ureterorenoscopy: yesterday, today, tomorrow].

Authors:  T Knoll; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.

Authors:  Susanne Deininger; Luis Haberstock; Stephan Kruck; Eva Neumann; Ines Anselmo da Costa; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Steffen Rausch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  R Mager; M Kurosch; T Höfner; S Frees; A Haferkamp; A Neisius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  [Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP)].

Authors:  U Nagele; D Schilling; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; K D Sievert; A S Merseburger; M Kuczyk; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Combined flexible and semirigid ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. Alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy of complex EWSL refractory nephrolithiasis].

Authors:  A K Ebert; W Schafhauser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Oncologic control obtained after exclusive flexible ureteroscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Morgan Rouprêt; Xavier Carpentier; Bogdan Geavlete; Sixtina Gil Diez de Medina; Olivier Cussenot; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on moderate size renal pelvis stones.

Authors:  Okan Bas; Hasan Bakirtas; Nevzat Can Sener; Ufuk Ozturk; Can Tuygun; H N Goksel Goktug; M Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Lower pole calculi larger than one centimeter: Retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.