Literature DB >> 18708295

MRI with a lymph-node-specific contrast agent as an alternative to CT scan and lymph-node dissection in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective multicohort study.

Roel A M Heesakkers1, Anke M Hövels, Gerrit J Jager, Harrie C M van den Bosch, J Alfred Witjes, Hein P J Raat, Johan L Severens, Eddy M M Adang, Christina Hulsbergen van der Kaa, Jurgen J Fütterer, Jelle Barentsz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with prostate cancer who are deemed to be at intermediate or high risk of having nodal metastases, invasive diagnostic pelvic lymph-node dissection (PLND) is the gold standard for the detection of nodal disease. However, a new lymph-node-specific MR-contrast agent ferumoxtran-10 can detect metastases in normal-sized nodes (ie, <8 mm in size) by use of MR lymphoangiography (MRL). In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRL with up-to-date multidetector CT (MDCT), and test the hypothesis that a negative MRL finding obviates the need for a PLND.
METHODS: We included consecutive patients with prostate cancer who had an intermediate or high risk (risk of >5% according to routinely used nomograms) of having lymph-node metastases. All patients were assessed by MDCT and MRL, and underwent PLND or fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Imaging results were correlated with histopathology. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, NPV, and PPV of MRL and MDCT. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00185029.
FINDINGS: The study was done in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands between April 8, 2003, and April 19, 2005. 375 consecutive patients were included. 61 of 375 (16%) patients had lymph-node metastases. Sensitivity was 34% (21 of 61; 95% CI 23-48) for MDCT and 82% (50 of 61; 70-90) for MRL (McNemar's test p<0.05). Specificity was 97% (303 of 314; 94-98) for MDCT and 93% (291 of 314; 89-95) for MRL. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 66% (21 of 32; 47-81) for MDCT and 69% (50 of 73; 56-79) for MRL. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 88% (303 of 343; 84-91) for MDCT and 96% (291 of 302; 93-98) for MRL (McNemar's test p<0.05). Of the 61 patients with lymph-node metastases, 50 were detected by MRL, of which 40 (80%) had metastases in normal-sized lymph nodes. The high sensitivity and NPV of MRL imply that in patients with a negative MRL, the chance of positive lymph nodes is less than 11/302 (4%).
INTERPRETATION: MRL had significantly higher sensitivity and NPV than MDCT for patients with prostate cancer who had intermediate or high risk of having lymph-node metastases. In such patients, after a negative MRL, the post-test probability of having lymph-node metastases is low enough to omit a PLND.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18708295     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70203-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  85 in total

1.  Preoperative assessment of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hisashi Imai; Ryuichiro Doi; Hiroyuki Kanazawa; Naoko Kamo; Masayuki Koizumi; Toshihiko Masui; Yasuhiro Iwanaga; Yoshiya Kawaguchi; Yasutsugu Takada; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  [Non-invasive imaging modalities for preoperative axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer].

Authors:  K Wasser; A Schnitzer; J Brade; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Inorganic nanoparticle-based contrast agents for molecular imaging.

Authors:  Eun Chul Cho; Charles Glaus; Jingyi Chen; Michael J Welch; Younan Xia
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 11.951

4.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Individualized image-based lymph node irradiation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hanneke J M Meijer; Oscar A Debats; Emile N J Th van Lin; Marco van Vulpen; J Alfred Witjes; Wim J G Oyen; Jelle O Barentsz; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Ferumoxytol-Enhanced MR Lymphography for Detection of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Genitourinary Malignancies: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Marcin Czarniecki; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie A Harmon; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo; Deborah E Citrin; James L Gulley; Mukesh Harisinghani; Ravi A Madan; Adam R Metwalli; Edmond Paquette; Peter A Pinto; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Lindsay S Rowe; Bradford J Wood; Paula M Jacobs; Liza Lindenberg; William Dahut; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Current and potential future role of PSMA-PET in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Daniel Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Matthias Guckenberger; Philipp A Kaufmann; Thomas Hermanns; Irene A Burger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Robert Jan Smeenk; Hanneke J M Meijer; Alfred J Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.