| Literature DB >> 23712209 |
Hanneke J M Meijer1, Oscar A Debats, Emile N J Th van Lin, Marco van Vulpen, J Alfred Witjes, Wim J G Oyen, Jelle O Barentsz, Johannes H A M Kaanders.
Abstract
Controversy surrounds the benefit of whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT) over prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT) for intermediate-risk and high-risk patients with prostate cancer. In the PSA screening era, two large randomized trials as well as multiple retrospective studies comparing WPRT with PORT have been performed, albeit with contradictory results. Data regarding the use of WPRT in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy are scarce. As a consequence, the practice of WPRT varies worldwide. Advanced highly accurate imaging methods for the detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer have been developed, such as PET, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), diffusion-weighted MRI and magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). The use of these new imaging methods might improve nodal irradiation, as they can be used not only for selection of patients, but also for accurately determining the target volume to reduce geographical miss. Furthermore, these new techniques can enable dose escalation to involved lymph nodes.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2013 PMID： 23712209 DOI： 10.1038/nrurol.2013.111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Rev Urol ISSN： 1759-4812 Impact factor: 14.432