Literature DB >> 30218382

Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Filippo Pesapane1, Marcin Czarniecki2, Matteo Basilio Suter3, Baris Turkbey2, Geert Villeirs4.   

Abstract

The detection of distant metastases at the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) establishes the treatment approach and has a prognostic value, nevertheless it is not well established. Since proposed staging approaches often contradict each other, we aimed to compare the current imaging techniques for staging of advanced PCa, including future applications of the most innovative methods. Conventional imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) have been employed for metastatic staging (both N and M staging) of men with high-risk PCa, but surgical pelvic dissection remains the gold standard for N staging. However, functional MRI by using diffusion-weighted imaging, MR lymphography (MRL) with ultra-small paramagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO), and hybrid PET/MRI imaging showed both high sensitivity and high specificity for nodal staging and depicting metastases. The standard of practice for M staging in PCa includes the radionuclide bone scan and targeted X-ray film, but their performance has generally been poor. Recently, MRI showed promising results with applications in both local and distant staging. Finally, with the development of new PET tracers, PET/CT and PET/MRI offer a combination of excellent pharmacokinetic characteristics, functional information, and precise anatomic localization and morphological correlation of tumor lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metastases; Hybrid imaging; Imaging staging; Lymph node metastases; Prostate cancer staging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30218382     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1208-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  137 in total

1.  Prospective head-to-head comparison of 11C-choline-PET/MR and 11C-choline-PET/CT for restaging of biochemical recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Isabel Rauscher; Michael Souvatzoglou; Tobias Maurer; Markus Schwaiger; Konstantin Holzapfel; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ambros J Beer; Matthias Eiber; Michael Souvatzoglou; Markus Schwaiger; Bernd Joachim Krause
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Challenges and recommendations for early identification of metastatic disease in prostate cancer.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Nelson N Stone; Evan Y Yu; Phillip J Koo; Stephen J Freedland; Susan F Slovin; Leonard G Gomella; E Roy Berger; Thomas E Keane; Paul Sieber; Neal D Shore; Daniel P Petrylak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  18F-Fluorocholine PET Whole-Body MRI in the Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ur Metser; Alejandro Berlin; Jaydeep Halankar; Grainne Murphy; Kartik S Jhaveri; Sangeet Ghai; Noam Tau
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Assessing the relation between bone marrow signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Katherine van Ree; David J Collins; Shirley D'Sa; Andreas Makris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Prospective comparison of computed tomography, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Matthias M Heck; Michael Souvatzoglou; Margitta Retz; Roman Nawroth; Hubert Kübler; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Bettina M Gramer; Gregor Weirich; Ina-Christine Rondak; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend; Bernd Krause; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Venkitaraman; G J R Cook; D P Dearnaley; C C Parker; V Khoo; R Eeles; R A Huddart; A Horwich; S A Sohaib
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.735

Review 8.  The Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Bladder and Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Chong Hyun Suh; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Wolfgang Loidl; Gabriele Broinger; Franz Stoiber; Ignac Foglman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [ (68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Markus Dietlein; Carsten Kobe; Georg Kuhnert; Simone Stockter; Thomas Fischer; Klaus Schomäcker; Matthias Schmidt; Felix Dietlein; Boris D Zlatopolskiy; Philipp Krapf; Raphael Richarz; Stephan Neubauer; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Novel Imaging in Detection of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clayton P Smith; Anna Laucis; Stephanie Harmon; Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Locally advanced prostate cancer imaging findings and implications for treatment from the surgical perspective.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Vishnupriya Kuchana; Rizwan Aslam; Ashish Kamat; Priya R Bhosale; A R Klekers
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

3.  Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Abdurrahman İnkaya; Ahmet Tahra; Resul Sobay; Ali Kumcu; Eyüp Veli Küçük; Uğur Boylu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-01

4.  Exploitation of CD133 for the Targeted Imaging of Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Paige M Glumac; Joseph P Gallant; Mariya Shapovalova; Yingming Li; Paari Murugan; Shilpa Gupta; Ilsa M Coleman; Peter S Nelson; Scott M Dehm; Aaron M LeBeau
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Tracked Foley catheter for motion compensation during fusion image-guided prostate procedures: a phantom study.

Authors:  Graham R Hale; Filippo Pesapane; Sheng Xu; Ivane Bakhutashvili; Neil Glossop; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 6.  Novel PET imaging methods for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Esther Mena; Peter C Black; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Michael Gorin; Mohamad Allaf; Peter Choyke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Imaging for Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anthony Turpin; Edwina Girard; Clio Baillet; David Pasquier; Jonathan Olivier; Arnauld Villers; Philippe Puech; Nicolas Penel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.