Literature DB >> 20232101

Preoperative assessment of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Hisashi Imai1, Ryuichiro Doi, Hiroyuki Kanazawa, Naoko Kamo, Masayuki Koizumi, Toshihiko Masui, Yasuhiro Iwanaga, Yoshiya Kawaguchi, Yasutsugu Takada, Hiroyoshi Isoda, Shinji Uemoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is an important prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer, but accurate preoperative diagnosis is difficult. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of diagnosis of PALN by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET).
METHODS: From August 2005 to July 2008, 119 patients with invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were included in this study. PALNs with a longer diameter >10 mm on CT or MRI were suspected of being involved by metastasis, whereas FDG uptake exceeding that of the adjacent normal tissue was considered to be positive for metastasis on FDG-PET studies. The imaging findings were compared with the pathological diagnosis of PALN metastasis.
RESULTS: PALN dissection was performed in 71 patients (60.0%). Although histopathological examination revealed metastasis in 6 patients (8.5%), none of these patients was positive in any of the preoperative imaging studies. The longer diameter, the shorter diameter, the ratio of the two diameters, and the calculated lymph node volume showed no significant differences between patients with and without PALN metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative detection of PALN metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer is very difficult. Intraoperative histopathological examination of frozen sections is necessary if radical resection is contemplated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232101     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-010-0066-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose for the differentiation of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Imdahl; E Nitzsche; F Krautmann; S Högerle; S Boos; A Einert; J Sontheimer; E H Farthmann
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Problems and prospects of modern lymph node imaging.

Authors:  Patrick Wunderbaldinger
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Pancreatic cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  R Herrmann; S Jelic
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  [Results of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 labeled fluorodeoxyglucose in differential diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  R Bares; B M Dohmen; U Cremerius; J Fass; M Teusch; U Büll
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Pancreatic Cancer Registry in Japan: 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Seiki Matsuno; Shinichi Egawa; Shoji Fukuyama; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Makoto Sunamura; Shuji Isaji; Toshihide Imaizumi; Shuichi Okada; Hiroyuki Kato; Kouichi Suda; Akimasa Nakao; Takehisa Hiraoka; Ryo Hosotani; Kazunori Takeda
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Pancreatic head cancer: accuracy of CT in determination of resectability.

Authors:  G Karmazanovsky; V Fedorov; V Kubyshkin; A Kotchatkov
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

7.  Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takanori Yoshida; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Atsushi Sasaki; Kohei Shibata; Masanori Aramaki; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography.

Authors:  Antonio Soriano; Antoni Castells; Carmen Ayuso; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Maria Teresa de Caralt; Maria Angels Ginès; Maria Isabel Real; Rosa Gilabert; Llorenç Quintó; Antoni Trilla; Faust Feu; Xavier Montanyà; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Salvador Navarro
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Lymph node staging with dual-modality PET/CT: enhancing the diagnostic accuracy in oncology.

Authors:  Patrick Veit; Stefan Ruehm; Hilmar Kuehl; Hrvoje Stergar; Stefan Mueller; Andreas Bockisch; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma--part 3: update on 5-year survival.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Daniel Laheru; Ralph H Hruban; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Flavia Dal Corso; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28

Review 2.  The lymphatic system and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Darci M Fink; Maria M Steele; Michael A Hollingsworth
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  Positive para-aortic lymph nodes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on short term survival and association with clinicopathologic features.

Authors:  Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Gouvas; Kleo Papaparaskeva; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients.

Authors:  Masayuki Sho; Yoshiaki Murakami; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Sohei Satoi; Ippei Matsumoto; Manabu Kawai; Goro Honda; Kenichiro Uemura; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Masanao Kurata; Takumi Fukumoto; Takahiro Akahori; Shoichi Kinoshita; Minako Nagai; Satoshi Nishiwada; Michiaki Unno; Hiroki Yamaue; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, assessment of resectability and metabolic response of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Wang; Feng Yang; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dailin Rong; Yize Mao; Wanming Hu; Shuhang Xu; Jun Wang; Haoqiang He; Shengping Li; Rong Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiro Masuda; Amanda M Dann; Irmina A Elliott; Hideo Baba; Stephen Kim; Alireza Sedarat; V Raman Muthusamy; Mark D Girgis; O Joe Hines; Howard A Reber; Timothy R Donahue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection.

Authors:  Sebastian Hempel; Verena Plodeck; Franz Mierke; Marius Distler; Daniela E Aust; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Accurate prediction of nodal status in preoperative patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using next-gen nanoparticle.

Authors:  Shaunagh McDermott; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ralph Weissleder; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Preoperative defining system for pancreatic head cancer considering surgical resection.

Authors:  Seok Jeong Yang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.