Literature DB >> 24248207

Optimal properties of the conditional mean as a selection criterion.

R L Fernando1, D Gianola.   

Abstract

Rules for selection that maximize the expected merit of selected candidates are discussed. When the proportion selected is constant, selection based on conditional means of merit given the observations is optimum in the above sense, regardless of the distribution. This does not hold if the proportion selected is random. When the expected value of the observations is a linear function of a set of unknown parameters, selection can be based on a vector of "corrected" records, w. It is shown that under normality, the conditional mean of merit given w is the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP), provided that the expected value of the merit function is the same in all candidates. A Bayesian argument is given to justify the use of BLUP as a selection rule when the expected merit differs from candidate to candidate.

Year:  1986        PMID: 24248207     DOI: 10.1007/BF00266552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  3 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Selection on selected records.

Authors:  B Goffinet
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  L Dempfle
Journal:  Ann Genet Sel Anim       Date:  1977
  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  On the quantitative genetics of mixture characters.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Bjorg Heringstad; Jorgen Odegaard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Genetic evaluation of traits distributed as Poisson-binomial with reference to reproductive characters.

Authors:  J L Foulley; D Gianola; S Im
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Long-term effects of selection based on the animal model BLUP in a finite population.

Authors:  E Verrier; J J Colleau; J L Foulley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  M Perez-Enciso; R L Fernando
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Leveraging genomic prediction to scan germplasm collection for crop improvement.

Authors:  Leonardo de Azevedo Peixoto; Tara C Moellers; Jiaoping Zhang; Aaron J Lorenz; Leonardo L Bhering; William D Beavis; Asheesh K Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Breeding Jatropha curcas by genomic selection: A pilot assessment of the accuracy of predictive models.

Authors:  Leonardo de Azevedo Peixoto; Bruno Galvêas Laviola; Alexandre Alonso Alves; Tatiana Barbosa Rosado; Leonardo Lopes Bhering
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of Complex Traits: Robust Alternatives to Best Linear Unbiased Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Alessio Cecchinato; Hugo Naya; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method.

Authors:  Andres Legarra; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Kent A Weigel; Nicole Krämer; Alessandra Stella; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.