Literature DB >> 26637542

An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Yvonne C J Wientjes1, Piter Bijma2, Roel F Veerkamp3, Mario P L Calus4.   

Abstract

Predicting the accuracy of estimated genomic values using genome-wide marker information is an important step in designing training populations. Currently, different deterministic equations are available to predict accuracy within populations, but not for multipopulation scenarios where data from multiple breeds, lines or environments are combined. Therefore, our objective was to develop and validate a deterministic equation to predict the accuracy of genomic values when different populations are combined in one training population. The input parameters of the derived prediction equation are the number of individuals and the heritability from each of the populations in the training population; the genetic correlations between the populations, i.e., the correlation between allele substitution effects of quantitative trait loci; the effective number of chromosome segments across predicted and training populations; and the proportion of the genetic variance in the predicted population captured by the markers in each of the training populations. Validation was performed based on real genotype information of 1033 Holstein-Friesian cows that were divided into three different populations by combining half-sib families in the same population. Phenotypes were simulated for multiple scenarios, differing in heritability within populations and in genetic correlations between the populations. Results showed that the derived equation can accurately predict the accuracy of estimating genomic values for different scenarios of multipopulation genomic prediction. Therefore, the derived equation can be used to investigate the potential accuracy of different multipopulation genomic prediction scenarios and to decide on the most optimal design of training populations.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GenPred; accuracy; genomic prediction; genomic selection; multipopulation; prediction equation; shared data resource

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637542      PMCID: PMC4788251          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.183269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  58 in total

1.  The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes.

Authors:  L N Hazel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires.

Authors:  L R Schaeffer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines using non-linear regression models.

Authors:  Heyun Huang; Jack J Windig; Addie Vereijken; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Malena Erbe; Birgit Gredler; Franz Reinhold Seefried; Beat Bapst; Henner Simianer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prediction of expected years of life using whole-genome markers.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Yann C Klimentidis; Ana I Vazquez; David B Allison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Frank W Nicholas; Andrew R Collins; Kyall R Zenger; Julie A L Cavanagh; Wes Barris; Robert D Schnabel; Jeremy F Taylor; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  30 in total

1.  Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Multi-population Genomic Relationships for Estimating Current Genetic Variances Within and Genetic Correlations Between Populations.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Jérémie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits, Principles, Overview of Factors Affecting the Reliability of Genomic Prediction, and Algebra of the Reliability.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Aaron J Lorenz; Lex E Flagel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Combining genetic resources and elite material populations to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in apple.

Authors:  Xabi Cazenave; Bernard Petit; Marc Lateur; Hilde Nybom; Jiri Sedlak; Stefano Tartarini; François Laurens; Charles-Eric Durel; Hélène Muranty
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.542

7.  Genomic selection efficiency and a priori estimation of accuracy in a structured dent maize panel.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Trends in genetic diversity and the effect of inbreeding in American Angus cattle under genomic selection.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Christian Maltecca; Duc Lu; Stephen Miller; John B Cole; Francesco Tiezzi
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Predicting the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Jack C M Dekkers; Hailin Su; Jian Cheng
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.

Authors:  Setegn W Alemu; Mario P L Calus; William M Muir; Katrijn Peeters; Addie Vereijken; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.