Literature DB >> 15471812

Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons.

J C M Dekkers1.   

Abstract

During the past few decades, advances in molecular genetics have led to the identification of multiple genes or genetic markers associated with genes that affect traits of interest in livestock, including genes for single-gene traits and QTL or genomic regions that affect quantitative traits. This has provided opportunities to enhance response to selection, in particular for traits that are difficult to improve by conventional selection (low heritability or traits for which measurement of phenotype is difficult, expensive, only possible late in life, or not possible on selection candidates). Examples of genetic tests that are available to or used in industry programs are documented and classified into causative mutations (direct markers), linked markers in population-wide linkage disequilibrium with the QTL (LD markers), and linked markers in population-wide equilibrium with the QTL (LE markers). In general, although molecular genetic information has been used in industry programs for several decades and is growing, the extent of use has not lived up to initial expectations. Most applications to date have been integrated in existing programs on an ad hoc basis. Direct markers are preferred for effective implementation of marker-assisted selection, followed by LD and LE markers, the latter requiring within-family analysis and selection. Ease of application and potential for extra-genetic gain is greatest for direct markers, followed by LD markers, but is antagonistic to ease of detection, which is greatest for LE markers. Although the success of these applications is difficult to assess, several have been hampered by logistical requirements, which are substantial, in particular for LE markers. Opportunities for the use of molecular information exist, but their successful implementation requires a comprehensive integrated strategy that is closely aligned with business goals. The current attitude toward marker-assisted selection is therefore one of cautious optimism.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471812     DOI: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE313x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  113 in total

1.  Genetic effects of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase (SCD) polymorphism on milk production traits in the Chinese dairy population.

Authors:  M A Alim; Y P Fan; X P Wu; Y Xie; Y Zhang; S L Zhang; D X Sun; Y Zhang; Q Zhang; L Liu; G Guo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Extent and consistency across generations of linkage disequilibrium in commercial layer chicken breeding populations.

Authors:  E M Heifetz; J E Fulton; N O'Sullivan; H Zhao; J C M Dekkers; M Soller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes.

Authors:  Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Comparison of skeletal muscle transcriptional profiles in dairy and beef breeds bulls.

Authors:  T Sadkowski; M Jank; L Zwierzchowski; J Oprzadek; T Motyl
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 6.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Comparative linkage mapping in the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus provides foundation for breeding management.

Authors:  Marie Foulongne-Oriol; Rémi Dufourcq; Cathy Spataro; Christine Devesse; Aurélien Broly; Anne Rodier; Jean-Michel Savoie
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Prediction of haplotypes for ungenotyped animals and its effect on marker-assisted breeding value estimation.

Authors:  Han A Mulder; Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Regression-based approach for testing the association between multi-region haplotype configuration and complex trait.

Authors:  Yanling Hu; Sinnwell Jason; Qishan Wang; Yuchun Pan; Xiangzhe Zhang; Hongbo Zhao; Changlong Li; Libin Sun
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.