Literature DB >> 22018123

Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Renee Mestad1, Gina Secura, Jenifer E Allsworth, Tessa Madden, Qiuhong Zhao, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent women have a high risk of unintended pregnancy. Currently, there are little data about their choice to initiate long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). STUDY
DESIGN: We evaluated the association of age and preference for a LARC vs. a non-LARC method among adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, comparing those aged 14-17 years to adolescents aged 18-20 years. We then analyzed the association between age and choice of the implant vs. the intrauterine device (IUD) among adolescents.
RESULTS: Of the 5086 women enrolled, 70% (n=3557) of participants chose a LARC method. Among adolescents aged 14-20 years, 69% of 14-17-year-olds chose LARC, while 61% of 18-20-year-olds chose LARC (relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.30). Among adolescents choosing a LARC method, 63% (n=93/148) of the 14-17-year-olds chose the implant, whereas 71% (n=364/510) of the 18-20-year-olds chose the IUD.
CONCLUSION: Long-acting reversible contraception use is clearly acceptable and common among adolescents enrolled in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, with the younger group being most interested in the implant.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018123      PMCID: PMC3505875          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  14 in total

1.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A pilot study on the acceptability of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device by young, single, nulliparous Chinese females following surgical abortion.

Authors:  Chiu-fai Ivy Li; S S N Lee; T C Pun
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Revisiting the intrauterine contraceptive device in adolescents.

Authors:  Alina Toma; Mary Anne Jamieson
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, national survey of family growth 2006-2008.

Authors:  Joyce C Abma; Gladys M Martinez; Casey E Copen
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2010-06

7.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

8.  Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women.

Authors:  W R Grady; D H Klepinger; A Nelson-Wally
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

9.  Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Karen A Bradley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Economic analysis of contraceptives for women.

Authors:  Chiun Fang Chiou; James Trussell; Eileen Reyes; Kevin Knight; Joel Wallace; Jay Udani; Karen Oda; Jeff Borenstein
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  46 in total

1.  Types of combined oral contraceptives used by US women.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Race-Ethnic Differences in the Non-marital Fertility Rates in 2006-2010.

Authors:  Yujin Kim; R Kelly Raley
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2014-08-08

Review 3.  Clinical practice: Contraception in adolescents.

Authors:  Johan Verhaeghe
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Why Didn't You Text Me? Poststudy Trends From the DepoText Trial.

Authors:  Cara R Muñoz Buchanan; Kathy Tomaszewski; Shang-En Chung; Krishna K Upadhya; Alexandra Ramsey; Maria E Trent
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.168

5.  A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Aletha Y Akers; Kym R Ahrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  2GETHER - The Dual Protection Project: Design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial to increase dual protection strategy selection and adherence among African American adolescent females.

Authors:  Alexander C Ewing; Melissa J Kottke; Joan Marie Kraft; Jessica M Sales; Jennifer L Brown; Peggy Goedken; Jeffrey Wiener; Athena P Kourtis
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Validity of self-reported history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Ann C Frisse; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Nhial T Tutlam; Courtney A Schreiber; Stephanie B Teal; David K Turok; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Changes in uptake and cost of long-acting reversible contraceptive devices following the introduction of a new low-cost levonorgestrel IUD in Utah's Title X clinics: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Lauryn P Roth; Jessica N Sanders; Rebecca G Simmons; Holly Bullock; Elizabeth Jacobson; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers.

Authors:  Katherine Blumoff Greenberg; Kevin K Makino; Mandy S Coles
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Lori Frohwirth; Jenna Jerman; Ronna Popkin; Kathleen Ethier
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 1.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.