Literature DB >> 26477942

A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Andrea J Hoopes1, Kelly Gilmore2, Janet Cady3, Aletha Y Akers4, Kym R Ahrens5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods can prevent teen pregnancy yet remain underutilized by adolescents in the United States. Pediatric providers are well positioned to discuss LARCs with adolescents, but little is known about how counseling should occur in pediatric primary care settings. We explored adolescent womens' attitudes and experiences with LARCs to inform the development of adolescent-centered LARC counseling strategies.
DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of one-on-one interviews.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from 2 urban school-based, primary care centers. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty adolescent women aged 14-18 years, diverse in race/ethnicity, and sexual experience.
INTERVENTIONS: Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using inductive and deductive coding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Major themes were identified to integrate LARC-specific adolescent preferences into existing counseling approaches.
RESULTS: Participants (mean age, 16.2 years; range, 14-18 years) represented a diverse range of racial and/or ethnic identities. Half (15/30) were sexually active and 17% (5/30) reported current or past LARC use. Five themes emerged regarding key factors that influence LARC choice, including: (1) strong preferences about device-specific characteristics; (2) previous exposure to information about LARCs from peers, family members, or health counseling sessions; (3) knowledge gaps about LARC methods that affect informed decision-making; (4) personal circumstances or experiences that motivate a desire for effective and/or long-acting contraception; and (5) environmental constraints and supports that might influence adolescent access to LARCs.
CONCLUSION: We identified 5 factors that influence LARC choice among adolescent women and propose a framework for incorporating these factors into contraceptive counseling services in pediatric primary care settings.
Copyright © 2015 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent health services; Contraception counseling; Contraceptive device; Intrauterine device; Qualitative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26477942      PMCID: PMC4934126          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  26 in total

1.  What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Asker; Helen Stokes-Lampard; Jackie Beavan; Sue Wilson
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2006-04

2.  Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Renee Mestad; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs.

Authors:  Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Marion Carter; Kathryn Curtis; Evelyn Glass; Emily Godfrey; Arik Marcell; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Karen Pazol; Naomi Tepper; Lauren Zapata
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-04-25

4.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Katie Davis; M Diane McKee
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion.

Authors:  Sally B Rose; Beverley A Lawton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services—United States, 2005-2013.

Authors:  Lisa Romero; Karen Pazol; Lee Warner; Lorrie Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Ghenet Besera; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Tara Jatlaoui; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  13 in total

1.  Yonder: Kidney transplant, supraventricular tachycardia, contraception, and dog walking.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Edith Fox; Anjana E Sharma; Jingwen Zhang; Sijia Yang; Damon Centola
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Multiple levels of social influence on adolescent sexual and reproductive health decision-making and behaviors in Ghana.

Authors:  Sneha Challa; Abubakar Manu; Emmanuel Morhe; Vanessa K Dalton; Dana Loll; Jessica Dozier; Melissa K Zochowski; Andrew Boakye; Richard Adanu; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  Consenting to invasive contraceptives: an ethical analysis of adolescent decision-making authority for long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Rosemary Talbot Behmer Hansen; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Trends in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: New Estimates Accounting for Sexual Experience.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Kimberly Daniels; Lisa Romero; Lee Warner; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Knowledge and Acceptability of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescent Women Receiving School-Based Primary Care Services.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kym R Ahrens; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Wren L Haaland; Anne-Marie Amies Oelschlager; Sarah Prager
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-04-11

7.  Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review Update.

Authors:  Anna W Brittain; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Emily Decker; Julia M Rollison; Nikita M Malcolm; Lisa M Romero; Emilia H Koumans
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Rachel Paul; Bridget C Huysman; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The Power of the Shared Experience: MTN-020/ASPIRE Trial Participants' Descriptions of Peer Influence on Acceptability of and Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention.

Authors:  Ariana W K Katz; K Naidoo; K Reddy; M Chitukuta; J Nabukeera; S Siva; C Zimba; E T Montgomery
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-08

10.  Strategies to improve the uptake of effective contraception in perinatally HIV-infected adolescents.

Authors:  Nadia Kancheva Landolt; Jullapong Achalapong; Pope Kosalaraksa; Witaya Petdachai; Chaiwat Ngampiyaskul; Stephen Kerr; Pongrak Boonyanurak; Jintanat Ananworanich; Torsak Bunupuradah
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2017-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.