Literature DB >> 18690545

Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: low and high-dose Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method, and plasma sample method.

Majid Assadi1, Mohammad Eftekhari, Mehrdad Hozhabrosadati, Mohsen Saghari, Abdolali Ebrahimi, Iraj Nabipour, Mohammad Zaki Abbasi, Darab Moshtaghi, Moloud Abbaszadeh, Sakineh Assadi.   

Abstract

The gamma camera uptake method with Tc-99m-DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) is a simple method for determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and is less time-consuming than other methods, but its diagnostic accuracy is debated. Gate's method (low-dose; LD), the high-dose method (HD), the predicted-clearance method, and the plasma-clearance method with Tc-99m-DTPA are compared in this study. We also performed GFR measurement and diuretic renography simultaneously. Tc-99m DTPA renography was performed in 36 patients aged 18-72 years with a wide range of renal function (serum creatinine 1.37 +/- 0.49 mg/dl). GFR was determined by four methods: the gamma camera uptake method with low-dose Tc-99m DTPA (Gates, LD); the gamma camera uptake method with high-dose Tc-99m DTPA (HD); the predicted creatinine clearance method (Cockcroft-Gualt, CG); and the plasma sample clearance (PSC) method using a mono-exponential curve. The PSC method was chosen as reference. The regression equations for the CG, Gates (low-dose), and HD methods against the PSC method were 28.68 + 0.80X (r = 0.72; P value < 0.0001, RMSE = 21.65 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), 6.19 + 0.79X (r = 0.90; P value < 0.0001, RMSE = 10.64 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), and 6.53 + 0.88X (r = 0.93; P value < 0.0001, RMSE = 9.35 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), respectively. In comparison with determination of GFR by the PSC method, the CG method tended to overestimate GFR while, perversely, the LD and HD methods tended to underestimate GFR. The three methods were in agreement with the PSC method but the high-dose GFR method resulted in less error in estimation of GFR. Furthermore, GFR measurement and diuretic renography could be performed at the same time when the high-dose method was used. Because of the low cost and negligible radiation burden, this method might be preferred for routine practice in nuclear medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690545     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9446-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method and plasma sample method.

Authors:  Kazuo Itoh
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Estimation of glomerular filtration rate with 99Tc(m)-DTPA: a comparative assessment of simplified methods.

Authors:  G Galli; V Rufini; C Vellante; G D'errico; R Piraccini
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee on renal clearance.

Authors:  M D Blaufox; M Aurell; B Bubeck; E Fommei; A Piepsz; C Russell; A Taylor; H S Thomsen; D Volterrani
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by the 99mTc-DTPA renogram is less precise than measured and predicted creatinine clearance.

Authors:  N G De Santo; P Anastasio; M Cirillo; D Santoro; L Spitali; L Mansi; L Celentano; D Capodicasa; E Cirillo; E Del Vecchio; C Pascale; G Capasso
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.847

5.  Glomerular filtration rate in children: determination from the Tc-99m-DTPA renogram.

Authors:  R M Shore; S A Koff; M Mentser; J R Hayes; S P Smith; J P Smith; R W Chesney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  99mTc-DTPA(Sn) dry-kit preparation. Quality control and clearance studies.

Authors:  V Kempi; R B Persson
Journal:  Nucl Med (Stuttg)       Date:  1975-01-31

7.  Determination of glomerular filtration rate using a dual-detector gamma camera and the geometric mean of renal activity: correlation with the Tc-99m DTPA plasma clearance method.

Authors:  E S Delpassand; K Homayoon; T Madden; M Mathai; D A Podoloff
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults.

Authors:  G B Haycock; G J Schwartz; D H Wisotsky
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Scintillation camera renography with 99mTc-DTPA and 131I-Hippuran.

Authors:  C G Bratt; I Larsson; T White
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Comparison and correlation of measurements of glomerular filtration rates by Tc-99m DTPA and 24-hour creatinine clearance.

Authors:  J Y Wang; Y S Lu; S J Wang; C H Cheng; K H Shu; J D Lian
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  1995-06
View more
  24 in total

1.  Fully automatic region of interest selection in glomerular filtration rate estimation from 99mTc-DTPA renogram.

Authors:  Kun-Ju Lin; Jia-Yann Huang; Yung-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from serum creatinine predicts total (urine and peritoneal) creatinine clearance in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Hulya Taskapan; Pliakogiannis Theodoros; Paul Tam; Joanne Bargman; Dimitrios Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations in adult Nigerians with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Emmanuel I Agaba; Chinyere M Wigwe; Patricia A Agaba; Antonios H Tzamaloukas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Methods of assessing renal function.

Authors:  Guido Filler; Abeer Yasin; Mara Medeiros
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Comparative evaluation of technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid renal dynamic imaging versus the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for the estimation of GFR.

Authors:  Qi Huang; Yunshuang Chen; Min Zhang; Sihe Wang; Weiguang Zhang; Guangyan Cai; Xiangmei Chen; Xuefeng Sun
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Sulfonylurea receptor as a target for molecular imaging of pancreas beta cells with (99m)Tc-DTPA-glipizide.

Authors:  Chang-Sok Oh; Saady Kohanim; Fan-Lin Kong; Ho-Chun Song; Nathan Huynh; Richard Mendez; Mithu Chanda; E Edmund Kim; David J Yang
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  A comparison of different methods for the determination of glomerular filtration rate in elderly patients with chronic renal failure.

Authors:  Beyza Macunluoğlu; Ibrahim Gökçe; Aydın Atakan; Münir Demirci; Elif Arı; Ahmet Topuzoğlu; Ali Borazan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  The modified CKD-EPI equation may be not more accurate than CKD-EPI equation in determining glomerular filtration rate in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Jian-Min Huang; Ying Li; Huai-Jun Liu; Yan Qu
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.902

9.  The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKDEPI) equation best characterizes kidney function in patients being considered for lung transplantation.

Authors:  Asishana A Osho; Anthony W Castleberry; Laurie D Snyder; Scott M Palmer; Mark Stafford-Smith; Shu S Lin; R Duane Davis; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Improved measurement of the glomerular filtration rate from Tc-99m DTPA scintigraphy in patients following nephrectomy.

Authors:  Yong-il Kim; Seunggyun Ha; Young So; Won Woo Lee; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.