Literature DB >> 20364322

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from serum creatinine predicts total (urine and peritoneal) creatinine clearance in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Hulya Taskapan1, Pliakogiannis Theodoros, Paul Tam, Joanne Bargman, Dimitrios Oreopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and the Cockcroft and Gault formula (CCrCG) in predicting total creatinine clearance achieved by residual renal function plus peritoneal dialysis in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis.
METHODS: Total creatinine clearance was defined as peritoneal creatinine clearance (PCcr) plus the average of urine urea and creatinine clearances (cGFR). Correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot were used to establish the degree of correlation and agreement between the estimations of creatinine clearance achieved by PCcr and the average of cGFR and estimated creatinine clearance based on serum creatinine by using either MDRD equation or the Cockcroft and Gault formula.
RESULTS: In one hundred fifty-six measurements, mean clearances by [cGFR + PCcr], CCrCG and MDRD were: 7.9 ± 3.1, 10.6 ± 5.2 and 8.5 ± 4.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. There was a good correlation between [cGFR + PCcr] and MDRD (r = 0.776, P < 0.05) and [cGFR + PCcr] and CCrCG (r = 0.735, P < 0.05). The mean MDRD was not significantly different from the mean clearance by [cGFR + PCcr] (difference 0.4 ± 2.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2), agreement limit -5.4-6.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). The CCrCG formula gave a larger difference from the mean [cGFR + PCcr] (2.8 ± 10.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and a much wider agreement limit (-3.7-9.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). In male patients, MDRD formula provided an estimate of clearance that was similar to the mean [cGFR + PCcr] (7.9 ± 3.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 8.2 ± 3.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; difference 0.10 ± 1.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2), limits of agreement -3.9-3.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). By contrast, in female patients, the MDRD equation significantly overestimated the clearance (difference between mean estimated and mean measured clearance 1.4 ± 4.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2), limits of agreement -6.6-9.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) P < 0.05). In conclusion, the GFR estimated by MDRD formula is similar to [cGFR + PCcr] especially in males. GFR by the CCrCG formula tended to overestimate the highest values of [cGFR + PCcr].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20364322     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9715-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  17 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease.

Authors:  A S Levey
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  The promising future of long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Oreopoulos; Elias Thodis; Kosmas I Paraskevas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Glomerular filtration rate determined from a single plasma sample after intravenous iohexol injection: is it reliable?

Authors:  F Gaspari; E Guerini; N Perico; L Mosconi; P Ruggenenti; G Remuzzi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Creatinine metabolism in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  W E Mitch; V U Collier; M Walser
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 6.124

7.  Creatinine excretion in continuous peritoneal dialysis: a systematic error of the Cockroft-Gault formula.

Authors:  A H Tzamaloukas; G H Murata
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: low and high-dose Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method, and plasma sample method.

Authors:  Majid Assadi; Mohammad Eftekhari; Mehrdad Hozhabrosadati; Mohsen Saghari; Abdolali Ebrahimi; Iraj Nabipour; Mohammad Zaki Abbasi; Darab Moshtaghi; Moloud Abbaszadeh; Sakineh Assadi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Measurement of residual renal function in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  R W van Olden; R T Krediet; D G Struijk; L Arisz
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.