Literature DB >> 11003823

Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils.

A B Kesel1.   

Abstract

During gliding, dragonfly wings can be interpreted as acting as ultra-light aerofoils which, for static reasons, have a well-defined cross-sectional corrugation. This corrugation forms profile valleys in which rotating vortices develop. The cross-sectional configuration varies greatly along the longitudinal axis of the wing. This produces different local aerodynamic characteristics. Analyses of the C(L)/C(D) characteristics, where C(L) and C(D) are the lift and drag coefficients, respectively (at Reynolds numbers Re of 7880 and 10 000), using a force balance system, have shown that all cross-sectional geometries have very low drag coefficients (C(D, min)<0.06) closely resembling those of flat plates. However, the wing profiles, depending upon their position along the span length, attain much higher lift values than flat plates. The orientation of the leading edge does not play an important role. The detectable lift forces can be compared with those of technical wing profiles for low Re numbers. Pressure measurements (at Re=9300) show that, because of rotating vortices along the chord length, not only is the effective profile form changed, but the pressure relationship on the profile is also changed. Irrespective of the side of the profile, negative pressure is produced in the profile valleys, and net negative pressure on the upper side of the profile is reached only at angles of attack greater than 0 degrees. These results demonstrate the importance of careful geometrical synchronisation as an answer to the static and aerodynamic demands placed upon the ultra-light aerofoils of a dragonfly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003823     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.20.3125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Approaches to the structural modelling of insect wings.

Authors:  R J Wootton; R C Herbert; P G Young; K E Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Aerodynamic evaluation of wing shape and wing orientation in four butterfly species using numerical simulations and a low-speed wind tunnel, and its implications for the design of flying micro-robots.

Authors:  Alejandro Ortega Ancel; Rodney Eastwood; Daniel Vogt; Carter Ithier; Michael Smith; Rob Wood; Mirko Kovač
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  A simple developmental model recapitulates complex insect wing venation patterns.

Authors:  Jordan Hoffmann; Seth Donoughe; Kathy Li; Mary K Salcedo; Chris H Rycroft
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Three-dimensional wing structure attenuates aerodynamic efficiency in flapping fly wings.

Authors:  Thomas Engels; Henja-Niniane Wehmann; Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Deformable wing kinematics in the desert locust: how and why do camber, twist and topography vary through the stroke?

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Contrasting micro/nano architecture on termite wings: two divergent strategies for optimising success of colonisation flights.

Authors:  Gregory S Watson; Bronwen W Cribb; Jolanta A Watson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Veins improve fracture toughness of insect wings.

Authors:  Jan-Henning Dirks; David Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of a Micro-CT Based Bio-Realistic Fruit Fly Wing.

Authors:  Joshua Brandt; Graham Doig; Naomi Tsafnat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.