Literature DB >> 31068445

Avian surface reconstruction in free flight with application to flight stability analysis of a barn owl and peregrine falcon.

Nicholas E Durston1, Xue Wan2,3, Jian G Liu2, Shane P Windsor4.   

Abstract

Birds primarily create and control the forces necessary for flight through changing the shape and orientation of their wings and tail. Their wing geometry is characterised by complex variation in parameters such as camber, twist, sweep and dihedral. To characterise this complexity, a multi-view stereo-photogrammetry setup was developed for accurately measuring surface geometry in high resolution during free flight. The natural patterning of the birds was used as the basis for phase correlation-based image matching, allowing indoor or outdoor use while being non-intrusive for the birds. The accuracy of the method was quantified and shown to be sufficient for characterising the geometric parameters of interest, but with a reduction in accuracy close to the wing edge and in some localised regions. To demonstrate the method's utility, surface reconstructions are presented for a barn owl (Tyto alba) and peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) during three instants of gliding flight per bird. The barn owl flew with a consistent geometry, with positive wing camber and longitudinal anhedral. Based on flight dynamics theory, this suggests it was longitudinally statically unstable during these flights. The peregrine falcon flew with a consistent glide angle, but at a range of air speeds with varying geometry. Unlike the barn owl, its glide configuration did not provide a clear indication of longitudinal static stability/instability. Aspects of the geometries adopted by both birds appeared to be related to control corrections and this method would be well suited for future investigations in this area, as well as for other quantitative studies into avian flight dynamics.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bird flight; Falco peregrinus; Flight control; Flight dynamics; Stereo-photogrammetry; Tyto alba; Wing geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31068445      PMCID: PMC6525094          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.185488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight.

Authors:  A L Thomas; G K Taylor
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Biomechanics of bird flight.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Bird maneuvering flight: blurred bodies, clear heads.

Authors:  D R Warrick; M W Bundle; K P Dial
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Hummingbird flight stability and control in freestream turbulent winds.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; James D Crall; Lucas McNeilly; Susan F Gagliardi; Andrew A Biewener; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  High-speed surface reconstruction of a flying bird using structured light.

Authors:  Marc E Deetjen; Andrew A Biewener; David Lentink
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Aerodynamic consequences of wing morphing during emulated take-off and gliding in birds.

Authors:  Brett Klaassen van Oorschot; Emily A Mistick; Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Avian surface reconstruction in free flight with application to flight stability analysis of a barn owl and peregrine falcon.

Authors:  Nicholas E Durston; Xue Wan; Jian G Liu; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Gliding flight in a jackdaw: a wind tunnel study.

Authors:  M Rosén; A Hedenström
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Operation of the alula as an indicator of gear change in hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Quantifying the dynamic wing morphing of hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Masateru Maeda; Toshiyuki Nakata; Ikuo Kitamura; Hiroto Tanaka; Hao Liu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantifying avian inertial properties using calibrated computed tomography.

Authors:  Nicholas E Durston; Yusuf Mahadik; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Avian surface reconstruction in free flight with application to flight stability analysis of a barn owl and peregrine falcon.

Authors:  Nicholas E Durston; Xue Wan; Jian G Liu; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Virtual manipulation of tail postures of a gliding barn owl (Tyto alba) demonstrates drag minimization when gliding.

Authors:  Jialei Song; Jorn A Cheney; Richard J Bomphrey; James R Usherwood
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  A Comparison of Aerodynamic Parameters in Two Subspecies of the American Barn Owl (Tyto furcata).

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Paolo Michael Piedrahita
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  High aerodynamic lift from the tail reduces drag in gliding raptors.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Jorn A Cheney; Jialei Song; Shane P Windsor; Jonathan P J Stevenson; Uwe Dierksheide; Alex Nila; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Bird wings act as a suspension system that rejects gusts.

Authors:  Jorn A Cheney; Jonathan P J Stevenson; Nicholas E Durston; Jialei Song; James R Usherwood; Richard J Bomphrey; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.