Literature DB >> 17575042

Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight.

Bret W Tobalske1, Douglas R Warrick, Christopher J Clark, Donald R Powers, Tyson L Hedrick, Gabriel A Hyder, Andrew A Biewener.   

Abstract

Hummingbirds are specialized for hovering flight, and substantial research has explored this behavior. Forward flight is also important to hummingbirds, but the manner in which they perform forward flight is not well documented. Previous research suggests that hummingbirds increase flight velocity by simultaneously tilting their body angle and stroke-plane angle of the wings, without varying wingbeat frequency and upstroke: downstroke span ratio. We hypothesized that other wing kinematics besides stroke-plane angle would vary in hummingbirds. To test this, we used synchronized high-speed (500 Hz) video cameras and measured the three-dimensional wing and body kinematics of rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus, 3 g, N=5) as they flew at velocities of 0-12 m s(-1) in a wind tunnel. Consistent with earlier research, the angles of the body and the stroke plane changed with velocity, and the effect of velocity on wingbeat frequency was not significant. However, hummingbirds significantly altered other wing kinematics including chord angle, angle of attack, anatomical stroke-plane angle relative to their body, percent of wingbeat in downstroke, wingbeat amplitude, angular velocity of the wing, wingspan at mid-downstroke, and span ratio of the wingtips and wrists. This variation in bird-centered kinematics led to significant effects of flight velocity on the angle of attack of the wing and the area and angles of the global stroke planes during downstroke and upstroke. We provide new evidence that the paths of the wingtips and wrists change gradually but consistently with velocity, as in other bird species that possess pointed wings. Although hummingbirds flex their wings slightly at the wrist during upstroke, their average wingtip-span ratio of 93% revealed that they have kinematically ;rigid' wings compared with other avian species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575042     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.005686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  46 in total

1.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Structure of the vortex wake in hovering Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  M Wolf; V M Ortega-Jimenez; R Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Precocial development of locomotor performance in a ground-dwelling bird (Alectoris chukar): negotiating a three-dimensional terrestrial environment.

Authors:  Brandon E Jackson; Paolo Segre; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Melissa S Bowlin; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Predicting power-optimal kinematics of avian wings.

Authors:  Ben Parslew
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Computational investigation of cicada aerodynamics in forward flight.

Authors:  Hui Wan; Haibo Dong; Kuo Gai
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Simultaneous measurements of three-dimensional trajectories and wingbeat frequencies of birds in the field.

Authors:  Hangjian Ling; Guillam E Mclvor; Geoff Nagy; Sepehr MohaimenianPour; Richard T Vaughan; Alex Thornton; Nicholas T Ouellette
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.