PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate soft tissue tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 88 histologically proven tumors (44 benign, 8 intermediate, 36 malignant) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Images of the tumors were obtained using a single-shot, spin-echo type echo-planar imaging sequence. The tumors were classified histologically as myxoid or nonmyxoid. We then compared the ADC values of the myxoid and nonmyxoid tumors; the benign and malignant myxoid tumors; and the benign, intermediate, and malignant nonmyxoid tumors. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of the myxoid tumors (2.08 +/- 0.51 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly greater than that of the nonmyxoid tumors (1.13 +/- 0.40 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean ADC values between benign myxoid tumors (2.10 +/- 0.50 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and malignant myxoid tumors (2.05 +/- 0.58 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). The mean ADC value of benign nonmyxoid tumors (1.31 +/- 0.46 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly higher than that of malignant nonmyxoid tumors (0.94 +/- 0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ADC value might be useful for diagnosing the malignancy of nonmyxoid soft tissue tumors.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate soft tissue tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 88 histologically proven tumors (44 benign, 8 intermediate, 36 malignant) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Images of the tumors were obtained using a single-shot, spin-echo type echo-planar imaging sequence. The tumors were classified histologically as myxoid or nonmyxoid. We then compared the ADC values of the myxoid and nonmyxoid tumors; the benign and malignant myxoid tumors; and the benign, intermediate, and malignant nonmyxoid tumors. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of the myxoid tumors (2.08 +/- 0.51 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly greater than that of the nonmyxoid tumors (1.13 +/- 0.40 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean ADC values between benign myxoid tumors (2.10 +/- 0.50 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and malignant myxoid tumors (2.05 +/- 0.58 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). The mean ADC value of benign nonmyxoid tumors (1.31 +/- 0.46 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly higher than that of malignant nonmyxoid tumors (0.94 +/- 0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ADC value might be useful for diagnosing the malignancy of nonmyxoid soft tissue tumors.
Authors: J Wang; S Takashima; F Takayama; S Kawakami; A Saito; T Matsushita; M Momose; T Ishiyama Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: D M Panicek; C Gatsonis; D I Rosenthal; L L Seeger; A G Huvos; S G Moore; D J Caudry; W E Palmer; B J McNeil Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Catherina S P van Rijswijk; Maartje J A Geirnaerdt; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Johannes L Peterse; Frits van Coevorden; Antonie H M Taminiau; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Bin B R Kroon; Johan L Bloem Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-01-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian Philipp Reinert; Martin Ulrich Schuhmann; Benjamin Bender; Isabel Gugel; Christian la Fougère; Jürgen Schäfer; Sergios Gatidis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-12-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Alexey Surov; Shuji Nagata; Ahmed A Abd Razek; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Andreas Wienke; Thomas Kahn Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Frederique Gay; Bailiang Chen; Marie Zins; François Sirveaux; Jacques Felblinger; Alain Blum Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 2.199