Literature DB >> 11526259

Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

J Wang1, S Takashima, F Takayama, S Kawakami, A Saito, T Matsushita, M Momose, T Ishiyama.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) calculated from diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) images can be used to characterize head and neck lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T MR unit in 97 head and neck lesions in 97 patients. Images were obtained with a diffusion-weighted factor, factor b, of 0, 500, and 1,000 sec/mm(2), and an ADC map was constructed. The ADCs of lesions, cerebrospinal fluid, and spinal cord were calculated.
RESULTS: Acceptable images for ADC measurement were obtained in 81 (84%) patients. The mean ADC of malignant lymphomas, (0.66 +/- 0.17[SD]) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 13), was significantly smaller (P <.001) than that of carcinomas. The mean ADC of carcinomas, (1.13 +/- 0.43) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 36), was significantly smaller (P =.002) than that of benign solid tumors. The mean ADC of benign solid tumors, (1.56 +/- 0.51) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 22), was significantly smaller (P =.035) than that of benign cystic lesions, (2.05 +/- 0.62) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 10). No significant differences were seen in the mean ADC of cerebrospinal fluid and of spinal cord among four groups of lesions. When an ADC smaller than 1.22 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec was used for predicting malignancy, the highest accuracy of 86%, with 84% sensitivity and 91% specificity, was obtained.
CONCLUSION: Measurement of ADCs may be used to characterize head and neck lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11526259     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2202010063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  159 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after mastoidectomy: case report.

Authors:  Sharad Maheshwari; Suresh K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  MR evaluation of sinonasal angiomatous polyp.

Authors:  Y Z Wang; B T Yang; Z C Wang; L Song; J F Xian
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Can diffusion-weighted imaging distinguish between normal and squamous cell carcinoma of the palatine tonsil?

Authors:  K S S Bhatia; A D King; D K W Yeung; F Mo; A C Vlantis; K-H Yu; J K T Wong; A T Ahuja
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for staging patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Alain Luciani; Emmanuel Itti; Taoufik El-Gnaoui; Alexandre Vignaud; Pauline Beaussart; Shih-jui Lin; Karim Belhadj; Pierre Brugières; Eva Evangelista; Corinne Haioun; Michel Meignan; Alain Rahmouni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for prediction and monitoring of treatment response.

Authors:  Ann D King; Frankie K F Mo; Kwok-Hung Yu; David K W Yeung; Hua Zhou; Kunwar S Bhatia; Gary M K Tse; Alexander C Vlantis; Jeffrey K T Wong; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diffusion MR imaging features of skull base osteomyelitis compared with skull base malignancy.

Authors:  B Ozgen; K K Oguz; A Cila
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Diffusion weighted imaging in predicting progression free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Su Berrak; Sanjeev Chawla; Sungheon Kim; Harry Quon; Eric Sherman; Laurie A Loevner; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Diagnosing common parotid tumours with magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging vs fine-needle aspiration cytology: a comparative study.

Authors:  H Yerli; E Aydin; N Haberal; A Harman; T Kaskati; S Alibek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI parameters and human papillomavirus status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  C S Schouten; P de Graaf; E Bloemena; B I Witte; B J M Braakhuis; R H Brakenhoff; C R Leemans; J A Castelijns; R de Bree
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Utility of the k-means clustering algorithm in differentiating apparent diffusion coefficient values of benign and malignant neck pathologies.

Authors:  A Srinivasan; C J Galbán; T D Johnson; T L Chenevert; B D Ross; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.