Literature DB >> 29144153

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumours at 3 T.

Hyun Kyong Lim1, Won-Hee Jee1, Joon-Yong Jung1, Mun Young Paek2, InSeong Kim2, Chan-Kwon Jung3, Yang-Guk Chung4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumours at 3 T.
METHODS: 65 patients with treatment-naïve musculoskeletal tumours (47 malignant and 23 benign lesions) who underwent 3 T MRI including IVIM DW imaging were included. IVIM-derived parameters included pure diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion related incoherent microcirculation (D*, pseudodiffusion coefficient), and perfusion fraction (f). IVIM parameters and mono-exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were retrospectively measured by two independent musculoskeletal radiologists.
RESULTS: D and ADC values of malignant tumours (923 ± 360, 965 ± 353 µm2 s-1, respectively) were significantly lower than those of benign tumours (1668 ± 546, 1689 ± 526 µm2 s-1) (p < 0.001). F values of malignant tumours (9.6%) were significantly higher than those of benign tumours (7.2%) (p = 0.021), whereas D* values showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of D, ADC and f were 0.874, 0.880 and 0.671, respectively. Using cut-off values of D and ADC of 1200 µm2 s-1, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 92, 83, 89%, 92, 87 and 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: D and ADC may be more accurate and reliable for differentiation of malignant from benign musculoskeletal tumours than f and D* at 3 T IVIM DW imaging. Advances in knowledge: Among IVIM-derived parameters, D is more accurate and reliable in differentiating malignant from benign musculoskeletal tumours than f and D* at 3.0T IVIM DW imaging. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of D and ADC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29144153      PMCID: PMC5965794          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  29 in total

1.  Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique.

Authors:  R Wirestam; M Borg; S Brockstedt; A Lindgren; S Holtås; F Ståhlberg
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Vivian S Lee; Elizabeth Hecht; Bachir Taouli; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterization of focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Koung Mi Kang; Jeong Min Lee; Jeong Hee Yoon; Berthold Kiefer; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Marc Van Cauteren; Tadateru Sumi; Makoto Obara; Yoko Ichikawa; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Mami Iima; Denis Le Bihan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours: use of additive qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging to standard MR imaging at 3.0 T.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Joon-Yong Jung; Michael Y Park; Sun-Ki Kim; Chan-Kwon Jung; Yang-Guk Chung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Shuji Nagata; Hiroshi Nishimura; Masafumi Uchida; Jun Sakoda; Tatsuyuki Tonan; Kouji Hiraoka; Kensei Nagata; Jun Akiba; Toshi Abe; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-07-27

9.  Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis of poorly contrast-enhanced and T2-prolonged bone masses: Initial experience.

Authors:  Yoshiko Hayashida; Toshinori Hirai; Toshitake Yakushiji; Kazuhiro Katahira; Osamu Shimomura; Masanori Imuta; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Kazuo Awai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases.

Authors:  A Andreou; D M Koh; D J Collins; M Blackledge; T Wallace; M O Leach; M R Orton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  13 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Şafak Parlak; F Bilge Ergen; Gökçe Yıldırım Yüksel; Jale Karakaya; Güzide Burça Aydın; Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu; Üstün Aydıngöz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Pediatric skeletal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: part 1 - technical considerations and optimization strategies.

Authors:  Apeksha Chaturvedi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 3.  Pediatric skeletal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, part 2: current and emerging applications.

Authors:  Apeksha Chaturvedi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-21

4.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in the characterization of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Nengzhi Xia; Yanxuan Li; Yingnan Xue; Weikang Li; Zhenhua Zhang; Caiyun Wen; Jiance Li; Qiong Ye
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.978

Review 5.  Bone marrow MR perfusion imaging and potential for tumor evaluation.

Authors:  James F Griffith; R A van der Heijden
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.128

6.  Multiparametric quantitative analysis of tumor perfusion and diffusion with 3T MRI: differentiation between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Seul Ki Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Chan Kwon Jung; Yang-Guk Chung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Evaluation of foot hypoperfusion and estimation of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty outcome in patients with critical limb ischemia using intravoxel incoherent motion microperfusion MRI.

Authors:  Nikolaos Galanakis; Thomas G Maris; Georgios Kalaitzakis; Nikolaos Kontopodis; Nikolas Matthaiou; Stavros Charalambous; Konstantinos Tsetis; Christos V Ioannou; Apostolos Karantanas; Dimitrios Tsetis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

8.  Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating soft tissue sarcoma from vascular anomalies.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Xuanlin Liu; Yan Xiong; Jun Ran; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  The incidence and diagnostic relevance of chemical shift artefact in the magnetic resonance imaging characterisation of superficial soft tissue masses.

Authors:  Asif Saifuddin; Shuaib Siddiqui; Ian Pressney; Michael Khoo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Differentiation of Pelvic Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma Using Radiomic Analysis Based on T2-Weighted Images and Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Images.

Authors:  Yi Dai; Ping Yin; Ning Mao; Chao Sun; Jiangfen Wu; Guanxun Cheng; Nan Hong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.