Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira1,2, Frederique Gay3, Bailiang Chen4, Marie Zins5,6, François Sirveaux7, Jacques Felblinger4, Alain Blum3. 1. Service d'Imagerie Guilloz, CHU Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Nancy, 54000, France. ped_gt@hotmail.com. 2. Université de Lorraine, IADI, UMR S 947, Tour Drouet Rue du Morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. ped_gt@hotmail.com. 3. Service d'Imagerie Guilloz, CHU Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Nancy, 54000, France. 4. Université de Lorraine, IADI, UMR S 947, Tour Drouet Rue du Morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. 5. University Versailles St-Quentin, 78035, Versailles, France. 6. Inserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, 94807, Villejuif, France. 7. Service de Chirurgie Traumatologique et Orthopédique, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, 54000, Nancy, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) correlated with T2 signal in differentiating non-fatty benign from malignant tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients with a histologically confirmed non-fatty soft tissue tumors (46 benign and 30 malignant) were prospectively included in this ethics committee approved study. All patients signed an informed consent and underwent MRI with DWI with two b values (0 and 600). ADC values from the solid components of these tumors were obtained and were correlated with the lesion's signal intensity on T2-weighted fat-saturated sequences. ADC values were obtained from adjacent normal muscle to allow calculation of tumor/muscle ADC ratios. RESULTS: There were 58 hyperintense and 18 iso or hypointense lesions. All hypointense lesions were benign. The mean ADC values for benign and malignant tumors were 1.47 ± 0.54 × 10(-3) and 1.17 ± 0.38 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s respectively (p < 0.005). The mean ADC ratio in benign iso or hypointense tumors was significantly lower than that of hyperintense ones (0.76 ± 0.21 versus 1.58 ± 0.82 - p < 0.0001). An ADC ratio lower than 0.915 was highly specific for malignancy (96.4 %), whereas an ADC ratio higher than 1.32 was highly sensitive for benign lesions (90 %). CONCLUSION: ADC analysis can be useful in the initial characterization of T2 hyperintense non-fatty soft tissue masses, although this technique alone is not likely to change patient management.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) correlated with T2 signal in differentiating non-fatty benign from malignant tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients with a histologically confirmed non-fatty soft tissue tumors (46 benign and 30 malignant) were prospectively included in this ethics committee approved study. All patients signed an informed consent and underwent MRI with DWI with two b values (0 and 600). ADC values from the solid components of these tumors were obtained and were correlated with the lesion's signal intensity on T2-weighted fat-saturated sequences. ADC values were obtained from adjacent normal muscle to allow calculation of tumor/muscle ADC ratios. RESULTS: There were 58 hyperintense and 18 iso or hypointense lesions. All hypointense lesions were benign. The mean ADC values for benign and malignant tumors were 1.47 ± 0.54 × 10(-3) and 1.17 ± 0.38 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s respectively (p < 0.005). The mean ADC ratio in benign iso or hypointense tumors was significantly lower than that of hyperintense ones (0.76 ± 0.21 versus 1.58 ± 0.82 - p < 0.0001). An ADC ratio lower than 0.915 was highly specific for malignancy (96.4 %), whereas an ADC ratio higher than 1.32 was highly sensitive for benign lesions (90 %). CONCLUSION: ADC analysis can be useful in the initial characterization of T2 hyperintense non-fatty soft tissue masses, although this technique alone is not likely to change patient management.
Authors: Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Katja Pinker; Günther Grabner; Andreas Stadlbauer; Michael Weber; Ewald Moser; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas; Eric A Walker; Chika I Logie; Loren E Clarke; Dennis M Duryea; Mark D Murphey Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Madelaine Hettler; Julia Kitz; Ali Seif Amir Hosseini; Manuel Guhlich; Babak Panahi; Jennifer Ernst; Lena-Christin Conradi; Michael Ghadimi; Philipp Ströbel; Jens Jakob Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 6.575