Literature DB >> 18661159

Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans.

James P Sieradzki1, Eldin E Karaikovic, Eugene P Lautenschlager, Martin L Lazarus.   

Abstract

In spite of concerns about safety during their insertion, cervical spine pedicle screws have demonstrated biomechanical superiority over lateral mass screws in several biomechanical studies. One of the concerns for placement of cervical pedicle screws is their small size. Preoperative planning with computed tomography to assess pedicle width has been shown to be extremely accurate and is recommended by several authors. To date there has been no study assessing the accuracy of oblique radiographs for pedicle measurement. We sought to compare accuracy of the oblique radiographic measurements of cervical pedicle width with axial CT scan measurements. Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines C3-C7 were studied. Thin cut 1.25 mm computed tomography axial cuts were made through the pedicle isthmus. Oblique radiographs at 35 degrees , 45 degrees , and 55 degrees angles were taken of the right and left pedicles of each specimen using a standardized technique. Each radiograph contained a pin of known length to correct for magnification. All pedicles were again measured and corrected for magnification using the standard pin. Corrected oblique radiograph measurements were compared to CT for each specimen. The outer pedicle width was measured and agreed upon by consensus. The radiograph measurements were on average significantly larger than CT measurements for the pedicles indicating that the pin standard did not completely correct magnification. Plain radiographic data failed to reveal that one oblique angle was favorable to another in terms of magnification or precision. Plain radiographs at oblique angles do not provide accurate measurements of subaxial cervical pedicles at 35 degrees , 45 degrees , or 55 degrees angles. We recommend that thin cut axial CT scans be obtained on all patients prior to transpedicular fixation in the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661159      PMCID: PMC2527419          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0725-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  41 in total

1.  The anatomic variability of human cervical pedicles: considerations for transpedicular screw fixation in the middle and lower cervical spine.

Authors:  E K Shin; M M Panjabi; N C Chen; J L Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques.

Authors:  S C Ludwig; J M Kowalski; C C Edwards; J G Heller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement using the funnel technique.

Authors:  E E Karaikovic; W Yingsakmongkol; R W Gaines
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Possible complications of anterior perforation of the vertebral body using cervical pedicle screws.

Authors:  Eldin E Karaikovic; Wicharn Yingsakmongkol; Harry J Griffiths; Robert W Gaines
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-02

5.  [Placement of pedicle screws using different navigation systems. A laboratory trial with 12 spinal preparations].

Authors:  E Reichle; K Sellenschloh; M Morlock; C Eggers
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Thomas Mattes; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical anatomy of the cervical pedicles: landmarks for posterior cervical pedicle entrance localization.

Authors:  E E Karaikovic; S Kunakornsawat; M D Daubs; T W Madsen; R W Gaines
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-02

8.  Correction of cervical kyphosis using pedicle screw fixation systems.

Authors:  K Abumi; Y Shono; H Taneichi; M Ito; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Measurement techniques for upper cervical spine injuries: consensus statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Alexander R Vaccaro; Michael Fehlings; Charles Fisher; Marcel Dvorak; Steven Ludwig; James Harrop
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Transpedicular screwing of the seventh cervical vertebra: anatomical considerations and surgical technique.

Authors:  C Barrey; F Cotton; J Jund; P Mertens; G Perrin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  3 in total

1.  The ipsilateral lamina-pedicle angle: can it be used to guide pedicle screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine?

Authors:  Edward Bayley; Zergham Zia; Robert Kerslake; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Computed tomographic morphometric analysis of cervical pedicles in a multi-ethnic Asian population and relevance to subaxial cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Thangaraj Munusamy; Ady Thien; Mark Gerad Anthony; Ramesh Bakthavachalam; Shree Kumar Dinesh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Morphological study of the posterior osseous structures of subaxial cervical spine in a population from northeastern China.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wang; Jiali Leng; Jianhua Liu; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.